Skip to content
True DhammaLibrary · Community
MN 93PTS MN 2.14711 min read

With Assalāyana

Assalāyanasutta

A precocious brahmin student is encouraged against his wishes to challenge the Buddha on the question of caste. His reluctance turns out to be justified.

Translated by Bhikkhu Sujato · Pāli: Mahāsaṅgīti Tipiṭaka · Public domain (CC0) via SuttaCentral

  • 0.1Majjhima Nikāya 93Middle Discourses 93

0.2AssalāyanasuttaWith Assalāyana

1.1PTS 2.147Evaṁ me sutaṁ—So I have heard.11.2ekaṁ samayaṁ bhagavā sāvatthiyaṁ viharati jetavane anāthapiṇḍikassa ārāme.At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.

2.1Tena kho pana samayena nānāverajjakānaṁ brāhmaṇānaṁ pañcamattāni brāhmaṇasatāni sāvatthiyaṁ paṭivasanti kenacideva karaṇīyena.Now at that time around five hundred brahmins from abroad were residing in Sāvatthī on some business.22.2Atha kho tesaṁ brāhmaṇānaṁ etadahosi:Then those brahmins thought,2.3“ayaṁ kho samaṇo gotamo cātuvaṇṇiṁ suddhiṁ paññapeti.“This ascetic Gotama advocates purification for all four classes.2.4Ko nu kho pahoti samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetun”ti?Who is capable of debating with him about this?”

3.1Tena kho pana samayena assalāyano nāma māṇavo sāvatthiyaṁ paṭivasati daharo, vuttasiro, soḷasavassuddesiko jātiyā, tiṇṇaṁ vedānaṁ pāragū sanighaṇḍukeṭubhānaṁ sākkharappabhedānaṁ itihāsapañcamānaṁ, padako, veyyākaraṇo, lokāyatamahāpurisalakkhaṇesu anavayo.Now at that time the student Assalāyana was residing in Sāvatthī. He was young, tonsured, and sixteen years old. He had mastered the three Vedas, together with their vocabularies and ritual performance, their phonology and word classification, and the testaments as fifth. He knew them word-by-word, and their grammar. He was well versed in cosmology and the marks of a great man.3

3.2Atha kho tesaṁ brāhmaṇānaṁ etadahosi:Then those brahmins thought,3.3“ayaṁ kho assalāyano māṇavo sāvatthiyaṁ paṭivasati daharo, vuttasiro, soḷasavassuddesiko jātiyā, tiṇṇaṁ vedānaṁ pāragū …pe… anavayo.3.4So kho pahoti samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetun”ti.“This Assalāyana is capable of debating with the ascetic Gotama about this.”4

4.1Atha kho te brāhmaṇā yena assalāyano māṇavo tenupasaṅkamiṁsu; upasaṅkamitvā assalāyanaṁ māṇavaṁ etadavocuṁ:So they approached Assalāyana and said to him,4.2“ayaṁ, bho assalāyana, samaṇo gotamo cātuvaṇṇiṁ suddhiṁ paññapeti.“This ascetic Gotama advocates purification for all four classes.4.3Etu bhavaṁ assalāyano samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetū”ti.Please, worthy Assalāyana, debate with the ascetic Gotama about this.”

4.4Evaṁ vutte, assalāyano māṇavo te brāhmaṇe etadavoca:When they said this, Assalāyana said to them,4.5“samaṇo khalu, bho, gotamo dhammavādī;“They say that the ascetic Gotama is a speaker of principle.4.6dhammavādino ca pana duppaṭimantiyā bhavanti.But speakers of principle are hard to debate.4.7Nāhaṁ sakkomi samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetun”ti.I’m not capable of debating with the ascetic Gotama about this.”5

4.8PTS 2.148Dutiyampi kho te brāhmaṇā assalāyanaṁ māṇavaṁ etadavocuṁ:For a second time, those brahmins said to him4.9“ayaṁ, bho assalāyana, samaṇo gotamo cātuvaṇṇiṁ suddhiṁ paññapeti.“This ascetic Gotama advocates purification for all four classes.4.10Etu bhavaṁ assalāyano samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetu.Please, worthy Assalāyana, debate with the ascetic Gotama about this.4.11Caritaṁ kho pana bhotā assalāyanena paribbājakan”ti.For you have lived as a wanderer.”64.12Dutiyampi kho assalāyano māṇavo te brāhmaṇe etadavoca:And for a second time, Assalāyana refused.4.13“samaṇo khalu, bho, gotamo dhammavādī;4.14dhammavādino ca pana duppaṭimantiyā bhavanti.4.15Nāhaṁ sakkomi samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetun”ti.

4.16Tatiyampi kho te brāhmaṇā assalāyanaṁ māṇavaṁ etadavocuṁ:For a third time, those brahmins said to him,4.17“ayaṁ, bho assalāyana, samaṇo gotamo cātuvaṇṇiṁ suddhiṁ paññapeti.“This ascetic Gotama advocates purification for all four classes.4.18Etu bhavaṁ assalāyano samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetu.Please, worthy Assalāyana, debate with the ascetic Gotama about this.4.19Caritaṁ kho pana bhotā assalāyanena paribbājakaṁ.For you have lived as a wanderer.4.20Mā bhavaṁ assalāyano ayuddhaparājitaṁ parājayī”ti.Don’t admit defeat before going into battle!”

4.21Evaṁ vutte, assalāyano māṇavo te brāhmaṇe etadavoca:When they said this, Assalāyana said to them,4.22“addhā kho ahaṁ bhavanto na labhāmi.“Clearly, worthy sirs, I’m not getting through to you when I say:4.23Samaṇo khalu, bho, gotamo dhammavādī;‘They say that the ascetic Gotama is a speaker of principle.4.24dhammavādino ca pana duppaṭimantiyā bhavanti.But speakers of principle are hard to debate.4.25Nāhaṁ sakkomi samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetunti.I’m not capable of debating with the ascetic Gotama about this.’4.26Api cāhaṁ bhavantānaṁ vacanena gamissāmī”ti.Nevertheless, I shall go at your bidding.”

5.1PTS 2.149Atha kho assalāyano māṇavo mahatā brāhmaṇagaṇena saddhiṁ yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā bhagavatā saddhiṁ sammodi.Then Assalāyana together with a large group of brahmins went to the Buddha and exchanged greetings with him.5.2Sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi. Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho assalāyano māṇavo bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to the Buddha:

5.3“brāhmaṇā, bho gotama, evamāhaṁsu:“Worthy Gotama, the brahmins say:5.4‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo;‘Only brahmins are the best class; other classes are inferior.75.5brāhmaṇova sukko vaṇṇo, kaṇho añño vaṇṇo;Only brahmins are the light class; other classes are dark.5.6brāhmaṇova sujjhanti, no abrāhmaṇā;Only brahmins are purified, not others.5.7brāhmaṇāva brahmuno puttā orasā mukhato jātā brahmajā brahmanimmitā brahmadāyādā’ti.Only brahmins are the Divinity’s bosom sons, born from his mouth, born of the Divinity, created by the Divinity, heirs of the Divinity.’5.8Idha bhavaṁ gotamo kimāhā”ti?What do you say about this?”

5.9“Dissanti kho pana, assalāyana, brāhmaṇānaṁ brāhmaṇiyo utuniyopi gabbhiniyopi vijāyamānāpi pāyamānāpi.“But Assalāyana, brahmin women are seen menstruating, being pregnant, giving birth, and breastfeeding.5.10Te ca brāhmaṇiyonijāva samānā evamāhaṁsu:Yet even though they’re born from a brahmin womb they say:5.11‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo;‘Only brahmins are the best class; other classes are inferior.5.12brāhmaṇova sukko vaṇṇo, kaṇho añño vaṇṇo;Only brahmins are the light class; other classes are dark.5.13brāhmaṇāva sujjhanti, no abrāhmaṇā;Only brahmins are purified, not others.5.14brāhmaṇāva brahmuno puttā orasā mukhato jātā brahmajā brahmanimmitā brahmadāyādā’”ti.Only brahmins are the Divinity’s bosom sons, born from his mouth, born of the Divinity, created by the Divinity, heirs of the Divinity.’”

6.1“Kiñcāpi bhavaṁ gotamo evamāha, atha khvettha brāhmaṇā evametaṁ maññanti:“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.”6.2‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…6.3brahmadāyādā’”ti.

6.4“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?6.5sutaṁ te: ‘yonakambojesu aññesu ca paccantimesu janapadesu dveva vaṇṇā—ayyo ceva dāso ca; ayyo hutvā dāso hoti, dāso hutvā ayyo hotī’”ti?Have you heard that in Greece and Persia and other foreign lands there are only two classes, masters and bonded servants; and that masters may become servants, and servants masters?”8

6.6“Evaṁ, bho, sutaṁ taṁ me: ‘yonakambojesu aññesu ca paccantimesu janapadesu dveva vaṇṇā—ayyo ceva dāso ca; ayyo hutvā dāso hoti, dāso hutvā ayyo hotī’”ti.“Yes, I have heard that.”

6.7“Ettha, assalāyana, brāhmaṇānaṁ kiṁ balaṁ, ko assāso yadettha brāhmaṇā evamāhaṁsu:“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”6.8‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…6.9brahmadāyādā’”ti?

7.1“Kiñcāpi bhavaṁ gotamo evamāha, atha khvettha brāhmaṇā evametaṁ maññanti:“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.”7.2‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…7.3brahmadāyādā’”ti.

7.4PTS 2.150“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?7.5khattiyova nu kho pāṇātipātī adinnādāyī kāmesumicchācārī musāvādī pisuṇavāco pharusavāco samphappalāpī abhijjhālu byāpannacitto micchādiṭṭhi kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā apāyaṁ duggatiṁ vinipātaṁ nirayaṁ upapajjeyya, no brāhmaṇo?Suppose an aristocrat were to kill living creatures, steal, and commit sexual misconduct; to use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical; and to be covetous, malicious, with wrong view. When their body breaks up, after death, they’d be reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell. Would this happen only to an aristocrat, and not to a brahmin?7.6Vessova nu kho …pe…Or suppose a peasant,7.7suddova nu kho pāṇātipātī adinnādāyī kāmesumicchācārī musāvādī pisuṇavāco pharusavāco samphappalāpī abhijjhālu byāpannacitto micchādiṭṭhi kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā apāyaṁ duggatiṁ vinipātaṁ nirayaṁ upapajjeyya, no brāhmaṇo”ti?or a menial were to act in the same way. Would that result befall only a peasant or a menial, and not to a brahmin?”

7.8“No hidaṁ, bho gotama.“No, worthy Gotama.7.9Khattiyopi hi, bho gotama, pāṇātipātī adinnādāyī kāmesumicchācārī musāvādī pisuṇavāco pharusavāco samphappalāpī abhijjhālu byāpannacitto micchādiṭṭhi kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā apāyaṁ duggatiṁ vinipātaṁ nirayaṁ upapajjeyya.If they acted the same way, the same result would befall an aristocrat, a brahmin, a peasant, or a menial.7.10Brāhmaṇopi hi, bho gotama …pe…7.11vessopi hi, bho gotama …pe…7.12suddopi hi, bho gotama …pe…7.13sabbepi hi, bho gotama, cattāro vaṇṇā pāṇātipātino adinnādāyino kāmesumicchācārino musāvādino pisuṇavācā pharusavācā samphappalāpino abhijjhālū byāpannacittā micchādiṭṭhī kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā apāyaṁ duggatiṁ vinipātaṁ nirayaṁ upapajjeyyun”ti.For if any of the four classes were to kill living creatures, steal, and commit sexual misconduct; to use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical; and to be covetous, malicious, with wrong view, then, when their body breaks up, after death, they’d be reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell.”

7.14“Ettha, assalāyana, brāhmaṇānaṁ kiṁ balaṁ, ko assāso yadettha brāhmaṇā evamāhaṁsu:“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”7.15‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…7.16brahmadāyādā’”ti?

8.1“Kiñcāpi bhavaṁ gotamo evamāha, atha khvettha brāhmaṇā evametaṁ maññanti:“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.”8.2‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…8.3brahmadāyādā’”ti.

8.4PTS 2.151“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?8.5brāhmaṇova nu kho pāṇātipātā paṭivirato adinnādānā paṭivirato kāmesumicchācārā paṭivirato musāvādā paṭivirato pisuṇāya vācāya paṭivirato pharusāya vācāya paṭivirato samphappalāpā paṭivirato anabhijjhālu abyāpannacitto sammādiṭṭhi kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā sugatiṁ saggaṁ lokaṁ upapajjeyya, no khattiyo, no vesso, no suddo”ti?Suppose a brahmin were to refrain from killing living creatures, stealing, and sexual misconduct; from using speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical; and from covetousness, malice, and wrong view. When their body breaks up, after death, they’d be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. Would this happen only to a brahmin, and not to an aristocrat, a peasant, or a menial?”

8.6“No hidaṁ, bho gotama.“No, worthy Gotama.8.7Khattiyopi hi, bho gotama, pāṇātipātā paṭivirato adinnādānā paṭivirato kāmesumicchācārā paṭivirato musāvādā paṭivirato pisuṇāya vācāya paṭivirato pharusāya vācāya paṭivirato samphappalāpā paṭivirato anabhijjhālu abyāpannacitto sammādiṭṭhi kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā sugatiṁ saggaṁ lokaṁ upapajjeyya.If they acted the same way, the same result would befall an aristocrat, a brahmin, a peasant, or a menial.8.8Brāhmaṇopi hi, bho gotama …pe…8.9vessopi hi, bho gotama …pe…8.10suddopi hi, bho gotama …pe…8.11sabbepi hi, bho gotama, cattāro vaṇṇā pāṇātipātā paṭiviratā adinnādānā paṭiviratā kāmesumicchācārā paṭiviratā musāvādā paṭiviratā pisuṇāya vācāya paṭiviratā pharusāya vācāya paṭiviratā samphappalāpā paṭiviratā anabhijjhālū abyāpannacittā sammādiṭṭhī kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā sugatiṁ saggaṁ lokaṁ upapajjeyyun”ti.For if any of the four classes were to refrain from killing living creatures, stealing, and sexual misconduct; from using speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical; and from covetousness, malice, and wrong view, then, when their body breaks up, after death, they’d be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.”

8.12“Ettha, assalāyana, brāhmaṇānaṁ kiṁ balaṁ, ko assāso yadettha brāhmaṇā evamāhaṁsu:“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”8.13‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…8.14brahmadāyādā’”ti?

9.1“Kiñcāpi bhavaṁ gotamo evamāha, atha khvettha brāhmaṇā evametaṁ maññanti:“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.”9.2‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…9.3brahmadāyādā’”ti.

9.4“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?9.5brāhmaṇova nu kho pahoti asmiṁ padese averaṁ abyābajjhaṁ mettacittaṁ bhāvetuṁ, no khattiyo, no vesso, no suddo”ti?Is only a brahmin capable of developing a heart of love, free of enmity and ill will for this region, and not an aristocrat, peasant, or menial?”9

9.6“No hidaṁ, bho gotama.“No, worthy Gotama.9.7Khattiyopi hi, bho gotama, pahoti asmiṁ padese averaṁ abyābajjhaṁ mettacittaṁ bhāvetuṁ;Aristocrats, brahmins, peasants, and menials can all do so.9.8brāhmaṇopi hi, bho gotama …9.9vessopi hi, bho gotama …9.10suddopi hi, bho gotama …9.11sabbepi hi, bho gotama, cattāro vaṇṇā pahonti asmiṁ padese averaṁ abyābajjhaṁ mettacittaṁ bhāvetun”ti.For all four classes are capable of developing a heart of love, free of enmity and ill will for this region.”

9.12“Ettha, assalāyana, brāhmaṇānaṁ kiṁ balaṁ, ko assāso yadettha brāhmaṇā evamāhaṁsu:“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”9.13‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…9.14brahmadāyādā’”ti?

10.1“Kiñcāpi bhavaṁ gotamo evamāha, atha khvettha brāhmaṇā evametaṁ maññanti:“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.”10.2‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…10.3brahmadāyādā’”ti.

10.4“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?10.5brāhmaṇova nu kho pahoti sottisināniṁ ādāya nadiṁ gantvā rajojallaṁ pavāhetuṁ, no khattiyo, no vesso, no suddo”ti?Is only a brahmin capable of taking some bathing cleanser, going to the river, and rinsing off dust and dirt, and not an aristocrat, peasant, or menial?”

10.6“No hidaṁ, bho gotama.“No, worthy Gotama.10.7Khattiyopi hi, bho gotama, pahoti sottisināniṁ ādāya nadiṁ gantvā rajojallaṁ pavāhetuṁ, brāhmaṇopi hi, bho gotama …10.8vessopi hi, bho gotama …10.9suddopi hi, bho gotama …10.10sabbepi hi, bho gotama, cattāro vaṇṇā pahonti sottisināniṁ ādāya nadiṁ gantvā rajojallaṁ pavāhetun”ti.All four classes are capable of doing this.”

10.11“Ettha, assalāyana, brāhmaṇānaṁ kiṁ balaṁ, ko assāso yadettha brāhmaṇā evamāhaṁsu:“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”10.12‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…10.13brahmadāyādā’”ti?

11.1“Kiñcāpi bhavaṁ gotamo evamāha, atha khvettha brāhmaṇā evametaṁ maññanti:“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.”11.2‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…11.3brahmadāyādā’”ti.

11.4PTS 2.152“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?11.5idha rājā khattiyo muddhāvasitto nānājaccānaṁ purisānaṁ purisasataṁ sannipāteyya:Suppose an anointed aristocratic king were to gather a hundred people of various births and say to them:1011.6‘āyantu bhonto ye tattha khattiyakulā brāhmaṇakulā rājaññakulā uppannā, sākassa vā sālassa vā salaḷassa vā candanassa vā padumakassa vā uttarāraṇiṁ ādāya, aggiṁ abhinibbattentu, tejo pātukarontu.‘Please worthy sirs, let anyone here who was born in a family of aristocrats, brahmins, or chieftains take a drill-stick made of teak, sal, <i lang='pi' translate='no'>salaḷa</i>, sandalwood, or cherry wood, light a fire and produce heat.1111.7Āyantu pana bhonto ye tattha caṇḍālakulā nesādakulā venakulā rathakārakulā pukkusakulā uppannā, sāpānadoṇiyā vā sūkaradoṇiyā vā rajakadoṇiyā vā eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa vā uttarāraṇiṁ ādāya, aggiṁ abhinibbattentu, tejo pātukarontū’ti.And let anyone here who was born in a family of corpse-workers, hunters, bamboo-workers, chariot-makers, or scavengers take a drill-stick made from a mutt’s drinking trough, a pig’s trough, a dustbin, or castor-oil wood, light a fire and produce heat.’12

11.8PTS 2.153Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,What do you think, Assalāyana?11.9yo evaṁ nu kho so khattiyakulā brāhmaṇakulā rājaññakulā uppannehi sākassa vā sālassa vā salaḷassa vā candanassa vā padumakassa vā uttarāraṇiṁ ādāya aggi abhinibbatto, tejo pātukato, so eva nu khvāssa aggi accimā ceva vaṇṇavā ca pabhassaro ca, tena ca sakkā agginā aggikaraṇīyaṁ kātuṁ;Would only the fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire,11.10yo pana so caṇḍālakulā nesādakulā venakulā rathakārakulā pukkusakulā uppannehi sāpānadoṇiyā vā sūkaradoṇiyā vā rajakadoṇiyā vā eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa vā uttarāraṇiṁ ādāya aggi abhinibbatto, tejo pātukato svāssa aggi na ceva accimā na ca vaṇṇavā na ca pabhassaro, na ca tena sakkā agginā aggikaraṇīyaṁ kātun”ti?and not the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood?”

11.11“No hidaṁ, bho gotama.“No, worthy Gotama.11.12Yopi hi so, bho gotama, khattiyakulā brāhmaṇakulā rājaññakulā uppannehi sākassa vā sālassa vā salaḷassa vā candanassa vā padumakassa vā uttarāraṇiṁ ādāya aggi abhinibbatto, tejo pātukato svāssa aggi accimā ceva vaṇṇavā ca pabhassaro ca, tena ca sakkā agginā aggikaraṇīyaṁ kātuṁ;The fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood would have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire,11.13yopi so caṇḍālakulā nesādakulā venakulā rathakārakulā pukkusakulā uppannehi sāpānadoṇiyā vā sūkaradoṇiyā vā rajakadoṇiyā vā eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa vā uttarāraṇiṁ ādāya aggi abhinibbatto, tejo pātukato, svāssa aggi accimā ceva vaṇṇavā ca pabhassaro ca, tena ca sakkā agginā aggikaraṇīyaṁ kātuṁ.and so would the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood.11.14Sabbopi hi, bho gotama, aggi accimā ceva vaṇṇavā ca pabhassaro ca, sabbenapi sakkā agginā aggikaraṇīyaṁ kātun”ti.For all fire has flames, color, and radiance, and is usable as fire.”13

11.15“Ettha, assalāyana, brāhmaṇānaṁ kiṁ balaṁ, ko assāso yadettha brāhmaṇā evamāhaṁsu:“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”11.16‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo;11.17brāhmaṇova sukko vaṇṇo, kaṇho añño vaṇṇo;11.18brāhmaṇāva sujjhanti, no abrāhmaṇā;11.19brāhmaṇāva brahmuno puttā orasā mukhato jātā brahmajā brahmanimmitā brahmadāyādā’”ti?

12.1“Kiñcāpi bhavaṁ gotamo evamāha, atha khvettha brāhmaṇā evametaṁ maññanti:“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.”12.2‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …pe…12.3brahmadāyādā’”ti.

12.4“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?1412.5idha khattiyakumāro brāhmaṇakaññāya saddhiṁ saṁvāsaṁ kappeyya, tesaṁ saṁvāsamanvāya putto jāyetha;Suppose an aristocrat boy was to sleep with a brahmin girl, and they had a child.1512.6yo so khattiyakumārena brāhmaṇakaññāya putto uppanno, siyā so mātupi sadiso pitupi sadiso, ‘khattiyo’tipi vattabbo ‘brāhmaṇo’tipi vattabbo”ti?Would that child be called an aristocrat after the father or a brahmin after the mother?”

12.7“Yo so, bho gotama, khattiyakumārena brāhmaṇakaññāya putto uppanno, siyā so mātupi sadiso pitupi sadiso, ‘khattiyo’tipi vattabbo ‘brāhmaṇo’tipi vattabbo”ti.“They could be called either.”

13.1“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?13.2idha brāhmaṇakumāro khattiyakaññāya saddhiṁ saṁvāsaṁ kappeyya, tesaṁ saṁvāsamanvāya putto jāyetha;Suppose a brahmin boy was to sleep with an aristocrat girl, and they had a child.1613.3yo so brāhmaṇakumārena khattiyakaññāya putto uppanno, siyā so mātupi sadiso pitupi sadiso, ‘khattiyo’tipi vattabbo ‘brāhmaṇo’tipi vattabbo”ti?Would that child be called an aristocrat after the mother or a brahmin after the father?”

13.4“Yo so, bho gotama, brāhmaṇakumārena khattiyakaññāya putto uppanno, siyā so mātupi sadiso pitupi sadiso, ‘khattiyo’tipi vattabbo ‘brāhmaṇo’tipi vattabbo”ti.“They could be called either.”

14.1PTS 2.154“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?14.2idha vaḷavaṁ gadrabhena sampayojeyyuṁ, tesaṁ sampayogamanvāya kisoro jāyetha;Suppose a mare were to couple with a donkey, and she gave birth to a mule.14.3yo so vaḷavāya gadrabhena kisoro uppanno, siyā so mātupi sadiso pitupi sadiso, ‘asso’tipi vattabbo ‘gadrabho’tipi vattabbo”ti?Would that mule be called a horse after the mother or a donkey after the father?”

14.4“Kuṇḍañhi so, bho gotama, assataro hoti.“It’s a mule, as it is a crossbreed.14.5Idaṁ hissa, bho gotama, nānākaraṇaṁ passāmi;I see the difference in this case,14.6amutra ca panesānaṁ na kiñci nānākaraṇaṁ passāmī”ti.but not in the previous cases.”

15.1“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?15.2idhāssu dve māṇavakā bhātaro sodariyā, eko ajjhāyako upanīto eko anajjhāyako anupanīto.Suppose there were two young students who were brothers who had shared a womb. One was an educated reciter, while the other was not an educated reciter.1715.3Kamettha brāhmaṇā paṭhamaṁ bhojeyyuṁ saddhe vā thālipāke vā yaññe vā pāhune vā”ti?Who would the brahmins feed first at an offering of food for ancestors, an offering of a dish of milk-rice, a sacrifice, or a feast for guests?”

15.4“Yo so, bho gotama, māṇavako ajjhāyako upanīto tamettha brāhmaṇā paṭhamaṁ bhojeyyuṁ saddhe vā thālipāke vā yaññe vā pāhune vā.“They’d first feed the young student who was an educated reciter.15.5Kiñhi, bho gotama, anajjhāyake anupanīte dinnaṁ mahapphalaṁ bhavissatī”ti?For how could an offering to someone who is not an educated reciter be very fruitful?”

16.1“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, assalāyana,“What do you think, Assalāyana?16.2idhāssu dve māṇavakā bhātaro sodariyā, eko ajjhāyako upanīto dussīlo pāpadhammo, eko anajjhāyako anupanīto sīlavā kalyāṇadhammo.Suppose there were two young students who were brothers who had shared a womb. One was an educated reciter, but was unethical, of bad character, while the other was not an educated reciter, but was ethical and of good character.16.3Kamettha brāhmaṇā paṭhamaṁ bhojeyyuṁ saddhe vā thālipāke vā yaññe vā pāhune vā”ti?Who would the brahmins feed first?”

16.4“Yo so, bho gotama, māṇavako anajjhāyako anupanīto sīlavā kalyāṇadhammo tamettha brāhmaṇā paṭhamaṁ bhojeyyuṁ saddhe vā thālipāke vā yaññe vā pāhune vā.“They’d first feed the young student who was not an educated reciter, but was ethical and of good character.16.5Kiñhi, bho gotama, dussīle pāpadhamme dinnaṁ mahapphalaṁ bhavissatī”ti?For how could an offering to someone who is unethical and of bad character be very fruitful?”

17.1“Pubbe kho tvaṁ, assalāyana, jātiṁ agamāsi;“Firstly you relied on birth, Assalāyana,17.2jātiṁ gantvā mante agamāsi;then you switched to education,17.3mante gantvā tape agamāsi;then you switched to abstemious behavior.1817.4tape gantvā cātuvaṇṇiṁ suddhiṁ paccāgato, yamahaṁ paññapemī”ti.Now you’ve come around to believing in purification for the four classes, just as I advocate.”17.5Evaṁ vutte, assalāyano māṇavo tuṇhībhūto maṅkubhūto pattakkhandho adhomukho pajjhāyanto appaṭibhāno nisīdi.When he said this, Assalāyana sat silent, dismayed, shoulders drooping, downcast, depressed, with nothing to say.

18.1PTS 2.155Atha kho bhagavā assalāyanaṁ māṇavaṁ tuṇhībhūtaṁ maṅkubhūtaṁ pattakkhandhaṁ adhomukhaṁ pajjhāyantaṁ appaṭibhānaṁ viditvā assalāyanaṁ māṇavaṁ etadavoca:Knowing this, the Buddha said to him:

18.2“bhūtapubbaṁ, assalāyana, sattannaṁ brāhmaṇisīnaṁ araññāyatane paṇṇakuṭīsu sammantānaṁ evarūpaṁ pāpakaṁ diṭṭhigataṁ uppannaṁ hoti:“Once upon a time, Assalāyana, seven brahmin seers settled in leaf huts in a wilderness region. They had the following harmful misconception:1918.3‘brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo …‘Only brahmins are the best class; other classes are inferior.18.4pe…Only brahmins are the light class; other classes are dark. Only brahmins are purified, not others.2018.5brahmadāyādā’ti.Only brahmins are the Divinity’s bosom sons, born from his mouth, born of the Divinity, created by the Divinity, heirs of the Divinity.’

18.6Assosi kho, assalāyana, asito devalo isi:The seer Devala the Dark heard about this.2118.7‘sattannaṁ kira brāhmaṇisīnaṁ araññāyatane paṇṇakuṭīsu sammantānaṁ evarūpaṁ pāpakaṁ diṭṭhigataṁ uppannaṁ—18.8brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo …pe…18.9brahmadāyādā’ti.18.10Atha kho, assalāyana, asito devalo isi kesamassuṁ kappetvā mañjiṭṭhavaṇṇāni dussāni nivāsetvā paṭaliyo upāhanā āruhitvā jātarūpamayaṁ daṇḍaṁ gahetvā sattannaṁ brāhmaṇisīnaṁ patthaṇḍile pāturahosi.So he did up his hair and beard, dressed in magenta robes, put on his lined sandals, grasped a golden staff, and appeared in the courtyard of the seven brahmin seers.2218.11Atha kho, assalāyana, asito devalo isi sattannaṁ brāhmaṇisīnaṁ patthaṇḍile caṅkamamāno evamāha:Then he wandered about the yard saying,18.12‘handa ko nu kho ime bhavanto brāhmaṇisayo gatā;‘Where, oh where have those brahmin seers gone?18.13handa ko nu kho ime bhavanto brāhmaṇisayo gatā’ti?Where, oh where have those brahmin seers gone?’

18.14Atha kho, assalāyana, sattannaṁ brāhmaṇisīnaṁ etadahosi:Then those brahmin seers said,18.15‘ko nāyaṁ gāmaṇḍalarūpo viya sattannaṁ brāhmaṇisīnaṁ patthaṇḍile caṅkamamāno evamāha:‘Who’s this wandering about our courtyard like a village lout?18.16“handa ko nu kho ime bhavanto brāhmaṇisayo gatā;18.17handa ko nu kho ime bhavanto brāhmaṇisayo gatāti?18.18Handa naṁ abhisapāmā”’ti.Let’s curse him!’

18.19Atha kho, assalāyana, satta brāhmaṇisayo asitaṁ devalaṁ isiṁ abhisapiṁsu:So they cursed Devala the Dark,18.20‘bhasmā, vasala, hohi;‘Be ashes, lowlife!2318.21bhasmā, vasala, hohī’ti.Be ashes, lowlife!’18.22Yathā yathā kho, assalāyana, satta brāhmaṇisayo asitaṁ devalaṁ isiṁ abhisapiṁsu tathā tathā asito devalo isi abhirūpataro ceva hoti dassanīyataro ca pāsādikataro ca.But the more the seers cursed him, the more attractive, good-looking, and lovely Devala the Dark became.24

18.23Atha kho, assalāyana, sattannaṁ brāhmaṇisīnaṁ etadahosi:Then those brahmin seers said,18.24‘moghaṁ vata no tapo, aphalaṁ brahmacariyaṁ.‘Our fervor is in vain! Our spiritual path is fruitless!18.25Mayañhi pubbe yaṁ abhisapāma—For when we used to curse someone18.26bhasmā, vasala, hohi;to become ashes,18.27bhasmā, vasala, hohīti bhasmāva bhavati ekacco.ashes they became.18.28Imaṁ pana mayaṁ yathā yathā abhisapāma tathā tathā abhirūpataro ceva hoti dassanīyataro ca pāsādikataro cā’ti.But the more we curse this one, the more attractive, good-looking, and lovely he becomes.’

18.29‘Na bhavantānaṁ moghaṁ tapo, nāphalaṁ brahmacariyaṁ.‘Worthy sirs, your fervor is not in vain; your spiritual path is not fruitless.18.30Iṅgha bhavanto, yo mayi manopadoso taṁ pajahathā’ti.Please let go of your malevolence toward me.’

18.31‘Yo bhavati manopadoso taṁ pajahāma.‘We let go of our malevolence toward you.18.32Ko nu bhavaṁ hotī’ti?But who are you, worthy sir?’

18.33‘Suto nu bhavataṁ—‘Have you heard of18.34asito devalo isī’ti?the seer Devala the Dark?’

18.35‘Evaṁ, bho’.‘Yes, worthy sir.’

18.36‘So khvāhaṁ, bho, homī’ti.‘I am he, worthy sir.’18.37Atha kho, assalāyana, satta brāhmaṇisayo asitaṁ devalaṁ isiṁ abhivādetuṁ upakkamiṁsu.Then they approached Devala and bowed to him.

18.38Atha kho, assalāyana, asito devalo isi satta brāhmaṇisayo etadavoca:Devala said to them,18.39‘sutaṁ metaṁ, bho, sattannaṁ kira brāhmaṇisīnaṁ araññāyatane paṇṇakuṭīsu sammantānaṁ evarūpaṁ pāpakaṁ diṭṭhigataṁ uppannaṁ—‘I heard that when the seven brahmin seers had settled in leaf huts in a wilderness region, they had the following harmful misconception:2518.40brāhmaṇova seṭṭho vaṇṇo, hīno añño vaṇṇo;“Only brahmins are the best class; other classes are inferior.18.41brāhmaṇova sukko vaṇṇo, kaṇho añño vaṇṇo;Only brahmins are the light class; other classes are dark.18.42brāhmaṇāva sujjhanti, no abrāhmaṇā;Only brahmins are purified, not others.18.43brāhmaṇāva brahmuno puttā orasā mukhato jātā brahmajā brahmanimmitā brahmadāyādā’ti.Only brahmins are the Divinity’s bosom sons, born from his mouth, born of the Divinity, created by the Divinity, heirs of the Divinity.”’

18.44‘Evaṁ, bho’.‘That’s right, worthy sir.’

18.45‘Jānanti pana bhonto—‘But do you know18.46yā janikā mātā brāhmaṇaṁyeva agamāsi, no abrāhmaṇan’ti?whether your birth mother only had relations with a brahmin and not with a non-brahmin?’

18.47‘No hidaṁ, bho’.‘We don’t know that.’

18.48‘Jānanti pana bhonto—‘But do you know18.49yā janikāmātu mātā yāva sattamā mātumātāmahayugā brāhmaṇaṁyeva agamāsi, no abrāhmaṇan’ti?whether your birth mother’s mothers back to the seventh generation only had relations with brahmins and not with non-brahmins?’

18.50‘No hidaṁ, bho’.‘We don’t know that.’

18.51‘Jānanti pana bhonto—‘But do you know18.52yo janako pitā brāhmaṇiṁyeva agamāsi, no abrāhmaṇin’ti?whether your birth father only had relations with a brahmin woman and not with a non-brahmin?’

18.53‘No hidaṁ, bho’.‘We don’t know that.’

18.54‘Jānanti pana bhonto—‘But do you know18.55yo janakapitu pitā yāva sattamā pitupitāmahayugā brāhmaṇiṁyeva agamāsi, no abrāhmaṇin’ti?whether your birth father’s fathers back to the seventh generation only had relations with brahmins and not with non-brahmins?’

18.56‘No hidaṁ, bho’.‘We don’t know that.’

18.57PTS 2.157‘Jānanti pana bhonto—‘But do you know18.58yathā gabbhassa avakkanti hotī’ti?how an embryo is conceived?’

18.59‘Jānāma mayaṁ, bho—‘We do know that, worthy sir.18.60yathā gabbhassa avakkanti hoti.18.61Idha mātāpitaro ca sannipatitā honti, mātā ca utunī hoti, gandhabbo ca paccupaṭṭhito hoti; evaṁ tiṇṇaṁ sannipātā gabbhassa avakkanti hotī’ti.An embryo is conceived when these three things come together—the mother and father come together, the mother is in the fertile phase of her menstrual cycle, and the virile spirit is ready.’26

18.62‘Jānanti pana bhonto—‘But do you know18.63taggha, so gandhabbo khattiyo vā brāhmaṇo vā vesso vā suddo vā’ti?for sure whether that virile spirit is an aristocrat, a brahmin, a peasant, or a menial?’27

18.64‘Na mayaṁ, bho, jānāma—‘We don’t know that.’18.65taggha so gandhabbo khattiyo vā brāhmaṇo vā vesso vā suddo vā’ti.

18.66‘Evaṁ sante, bho, jānātha—‘In that case, worthy sir, don’t you know18.67ke tumhe hothā’ti?what you are?’

18.68‘Evaṁ sante, bho, na mayaṁ jānāma—‘In that case, worthy sir, we don’t know18.69ke mayaṁ homā’ti.what we are.’

18.70Te hi nāma, assalāyana, satta brāhmaṇisayo asitena devalena isinā sake jātivāde samanuyuñjīyamānā samanuggāhīyamānā samanubhāsīyamānā na sampāyissanti;Given that even those seven brahmin seers could not prevail when pursued, pressed, and grilled by the seer Devala on their own genealogy,2818.71kiṁ pana tvaṁ etarahi mayā sakasmiṁ jātivāde samanuyuñjīyamāno samanuggāhīyamāno samanubhāsīyamāno sampāyissasi, yesaṁ tvaṁ sācariyako na puṇṇo dabbigāho”ti.how could you prevail now being grilled by me on your own genealogy when you and your denomination do not so much as pick up the last spoonful?”29

19.1Evaṁ vutte, assalāyano māṇavo bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:When he had spoken, Assalāyana said to him,19.2“abhikkantaṁ, bho gotama …pe…“Excellent, worthy Gotama! …19.3upāsakaṁ maṁ bhavaṁ gotamo dhāretu ajjatagge pāṇupetaṁ saraṇaṁ gatan”ti.From this day forth, may the worthy Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”

19.4Assalāyanasuttaṁ niṭṭhitaṁ tatiyaṁ.

Translator’s notes

  1. This discourse records how the brahmin student Assalāyana took on the Buddha on the question of the four classes, an attempt that Assalāyana knew was doomed from the start. Like similar contests such as the Ambaṭṭhasutta (DN 3), it is rich in historical connections.

    ↩ mn93:1.1
  2. Similar gatherings were noted at Campā (DN 4:4.1) and Opāsāda (MN 95:7.1).

    ↩ mn93:2.1
  3. While this description is similar to that of brahmin students such as Ambaṭṭha (DN 3:1.3.1), it is only here and at MN 95:11.2 that we find the additional details that they are tonsured and sixteen years of age.

    “Tonsured” (vuttasira) literally means “circlehead” and it refers to the practice of shaving off all but a topknot (cf. nivṛttacūḍaka at Manusmṛti 5.67). According to Manusmṛti 2.65, the ceremony of tonsure (there called keśānta) is to be given to brahmins at sixteen, so this must be meant here. Contrast the usual brahmanical pejorative of muṇḍaka (“shaveling”, MN 81:6.8).

    ↩ mn93:3.1
  4. Assalāyana may be identified with Kauśalyaṣcāśvalāyana (“Assalāyana of Kosala”) who asked the sage Pippalāda about the nature of prāṇa (breath/life energy) in Praśna Upaniṣad 3. He was probably a grandson or further descendant (as indicated by the naḍādi formation of his name) of the Aśvala of Videha who debated Yājñavalkya (see note below).

    ↩ mn93:3.4
  5. This dialogue is modeled after the debate at Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 3.1 between Yājñavalkya and Aśvala. Foreign brahmins had come to Videha from Kuru and Pañcāla, the older-established and more prestigious Brahmanical lands (cf. the “western brahmins” of SN 42.6:2.1 and AN 10.176:1.5). King Janaka offered an extravagant prize of a thousand cows with gold-tipped horns for the greatest brahmin among them. But none dared step forward, so Yājñavalkya started to drive the cows home. Aśvala, the priest in charge of litany (hotṛ) for Janaka, challenged him to a debate, but was ultimately silenced.

    ↩ mn93:4.7
  6. This agrees with Praśna Upaniṣad 1.2, where Assalāyana, along with his fellow-seekers, is asked to live another year in fervor, spiritual practice, and faith (bhūya eva tapasā brahmacaryeṇa śraddhayā saṁvatsaraṁ).

    ↩ mn93:4.11
  7. This verse is also at DN 27:3.6 and MN 84:9.19.

    ↩ mn93:5.4
  8. “Greece” (yona, from “Ionia”) and “Persia” (kamboja) are loose exonyms indicating the regions dominated by Greek and Iranian culture.

    The Greeks and other foreigners are mentioned in Ashokan edicts, but this is the only reference to Greece in an early Buddhist text. The Sanskrit yavana appears shortly after the Buddha in Pāṇini 4.1.49. The Indic terms are derived from the Persian yauna, first attested in an inscription of Darius I (522–486 BCE), who conquered three Indian realms: gandāra (Gandhāra), hindush (Indus valley), and thataguš (Sattagydia, around modern Bannu in Pakistan). Soldiers from these realms served under Achaemenid kings from this time. Moreover, several Greek and Achaemenid coins dating back as far as Darius I have been found in the Kabul hoard as well as the Shaikhan Dheri hoard at the site of Puṣkalāvatī, capital of Gandhāra.

    “Persia” is one of the sixteen great nations (AN 3.70:28.2). It was the home of horses, lying to the west of Gandhāra (Pakistan) in modern Afghanistan. This was the easternmost extent of Iranian culture, and the passage here shows how different it was considered compared to the other nations. At this date, I think kamboja meant not just the specific location in Afghanistan, but more generally the Iranian peoples west of Gandhāra, just as yona (“Ionian”) is used for all people of Greek culture.

    The perceived difference in slave culture mirrors the Greek ambassador Megasthenes who, writing over a century later, said there were no slaves in India.

    ↩ mn93:6.5
  9. The next three examples are (1) meditating on love, (2) bathing, and (3) starting a fire. All of these reflect activities characteristic of brahmins: (1) the “divine meditations” (brahmavihāra) that originated as contemplation on the qualities of divinity, (2) ritual bathing to wash away sin, and (3) worship of Agni on the fire altar.

    ↩ mn93:9.5
  10. Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 11.5 relates how Purūravas, longing to be reunited with his queen, the nymph Urvaśī, was required by the Gandharvas to make a special fire. It must be generated by wood from a tree that grew from the ashes of celestial fire provided by themselves, the upper drill-stick of aśvattha (i.e. Bodhi tree) and the lower stick of śamī. In that legend, the essence of the fire is determined by its divine origin, against which the Buddha poses a naturalistic explanation.

    ↩ mn93:11.5
  11. This seems to be the only mention of the padumaka tree in Pali. It may be the Sanskrit padmaka, for which one possible identification is Prunus cerasoides, the wild Himalayan cherry.

    Here we find both sāka and sāla, so I translate sāka as “teak”, whereas at DN 3:1.15.10 I have sakhua, an alternate name for the sal tree.

    For salaḷa see note on SN 52.8:1.1.

    ↩ mn93:11.6
  12. Caṇḍālas (“corpse-workers”) are frequently depicted as the lowest of untouchables as seen by Brahmins. However, the usual rendering of “outcast” is unsatisfactory, as all the groups here are defined positively by their occupation, and moreover some, such as the scavengers, would also have been untouchable. The Pali commentaries equate the caṇḍāla with the chavaka (or chapaka) of Bu Sk 69:1.12.1, a “corpse disposer” (chavachaḍḍakacaṇḍālā; see also chavakacaṇḍālo at Mil 5.4.7:2.4). They were known for their “bone-washing” ceremony (DN 1:1.13.2, AN 10.107:1.1). This agrees with Rāmāyana 1.58.10, which describes a caṇḍāla as dark-complexioned, dirty, with disheveled hair, his body smeared with graveyard ash. Mahāvaṁsa 10.91–94 tells how King Paṇḍukābhaya employed caṇḍālas for cleaning streets and toilets, bearing the dead, and watching over cemeteries, with their village adjoining the cemetery.

    ↩ mn93:11.7
  13. A similar argument is made regarding consciousness at MN 93:11.5.

    ↩ mn93:11.14
  14. The complex question of intercaste children is usually governed by the assumption that the father supplies the “seed” which the mother merely incubates. Kauṭilya, however, notes a variety of opinions on this question (Arthaśāstra 3.7.1–3).

    Assalāyana’s views do not agree with the more developed doctrine found in later texts.

    ↩ mn93:12.4
  15. Since the brahmins declared their own class the highest, such a union is considered to be pratiloma (“contrary to the natural order”). Arthaśāstra 3.7.28 says such a child is a sūta; Manusmṛti 10.11 agrees, adding that their livelihood is a charioteer (10.47).

    ↩ mn93:12.5
  16. Baudhāyana Dharmasūtra 1.9.17 says that the child of a brahmin father and aristocrat mother is a brahmin. Manusmṛti 10.6 admits the same, though due to the “defect” of the mother they are considered “like” a brahmin.

    ↩ mn93:13.2
  17. “Shared a womb” is sodariya, the only occurrence of this term in early Pali.

    This thought experiment anticipates the modern method of studying twins to eliminate variables in development.

    ↩ mn93:15.2
  18. Here tape (“fervent austerity”) stands for ethical conduct, hence I translate “abstemious behavior”. Some manuscripts omit it, but I think it is required by the sense.

    ↩ mn93:17.3
  19. The “seven brahmin seers” (Sanskrit saptarṣi, (eg. Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 13.8.1.9, Atharva Veda 4.11.9c, Vājasaneyi Saṁhitā 13.26b) were renowned sages to whom the Vedic lineages (gottā) were attributed As the sutta’s conclusion will show, they are introduced here to demonstrate that the fallacy of geneology has been there since the beginning.

    A similar practice of living in wilderness is described at MN 25:9.5, SN 11.9, DN 23:21.3, DN 3:2.3.3, and DN 27:22.9. Chāndogya Upaniṣad 5.10.1–5 compares the forest contemplatives destined for the Brahmā realm with the ritualists who are reborn on the moon before returning to earth.

    ↩ mn93:18.2
  20. Mahābhārata 12.181.5 says that brahmins are the white class, aristocrats red, peasants yellow, and menials black.

    ↩ mn93:18.4
  21. Asita Devala is probably meant to be the legendary seer known as Asita or Devala son of Kāśyapa who composed Rig Veda 9.5–24, although they seem to share little but the name. He is an example of the “dark hermit” archetype, irrupting within Brahmanical traditions to subvert from within, relying on his mysterious power of otherness. See also Asita Kaṇhasiri (or Kāladevala, Snp 3.11:1.1), Kaṇha (DN 3:1.23.6), Kaṇhadīpāyana (Cp 31:1.2), and Sāma (Cp 33:1.1). Such encounters show how the contention between Vedic ritualism and native contemplatives challenged and elevated both traditions. In this way they invert the stereotype of Brahmanical colorism, paving the way for the ascension of the dark god Krishna.

    ↩ mn93:18.6
  22. His behavior is disrespectful, like that of Vepacitti, and unlike that of Sakka at SN 11.9. But the context is different, for there the seers were of good character and deserving of respect, whereas here they embrace wrong views.

    ↩ mn93:18.10
  23. See Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 6.6.3.10.

    ↩ mn93:18.20
  24. Compare SN 11.22:1.7.

    ↩ mn93:18.22
  25. This passage accurately conveys that caste was not just criticized by Buddhism, it was actively contested within Brahmanical circles. As just one of many examples, Yudhiṣṭhira said, “It is not by reason of family or study or learning that one is of high caste, but because of behavior alone” (Mahābhārata 3.297.61).

    ↩ mn93:18.39
  26. The gandhabba (normally “centaur”, here “virile spirit”) is, per the commentary, the being to be reborn. He represents the element of male sexuality in procreation. He is “father, begetter, kinsman”, by whose knowledge one becomes the “father’s father” (Arthavaveda 2.1.2–3). He is said to guard (Rig Veda 9.83.4) or steal (Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 3.2.4) or actually be (Rig Veda 9.86.36) the vitalizing liquid Soma, who is extracted on an altar as semen is extracted in the vagina (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 6.4.3). He thus lies within the waters (Rig Veda 9.86.36, 10.10.4) or within the womb (Rig Veda 10.177.2). It seems that, since semen is “a man’s essence” (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 6.4.1, Aitareya Upaniṣad 2.1), the seed of past lovers—curses against whom are helpfully provided (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 6.4.9–12)—remains in the womb. This is why the gandhabba possesses women (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.7.1, 3.3.1) and, unless placated with proper worship, might become a “hairy one” who devours embryos (Artharva Veda 8.6.23, see 8.6.18–19). To ward against such risks, in the rites of marriage and procreation, the gandharva king Viśvāvasa, a playboy and deadbeat father, is asked to “rise up” out of the woman (Rig Veda 10.85.21–22, Atharva Veda 14.2.33–6, Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 6.4.19) and find his pleasures with another, so that the husband may father the child. This contrasts with the Pali passage, where the gandhabba “is ready” for conception; in other words, a being is driven by their karma to be born there.

    ↩ mn93:18.61
  27. Chāndogya Upaniṣad 5.10.3–7 details the “path of the fathers” after death; they follow a winding path to the moon Soma, only to return as rain, grow as plants, be eaten, and ultimately be emitted as semen, thus determining the caste of the child. It seems from this passage, however, that this doctrine, convincing as it may seem, was not sufficient to allay male anxiety over paternity. Indeed, the very baroqueness of these conceptions show the doctrinal and ritual lengths required to fix paternity.

    ↩ mn93:18.63
  28. The syntax of this passage mirrors AN 6.18:4.12 and Kd 16:6.4.1. In each case, te hi nāma introduces a passage referring to events of the past whose outcome is framed in future tense (from the past point of view).

    ↩ mn93:18.70
  29. Puṇṇo dabbigāho is a highly specific reference to a detail of the Sākamedha ritual that marks the beginning of winter. From the rice offering on the first day, a pot is set aside until the next morning, when the very last “full spoon” (pūrṇā darvi) is scraped up, with the invocation, “Full, O spoon, fly off, and fly back to us well filled!” (Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 2.5.3.16–17, Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇa 5.6.20; invocation found at Atharva Veda 3.10.7c, Maitrāyaṇī Saṁhitā 1.10.2, Vājasaneyi Saṁhitā 3.49a). This ensures that present prosperity will be renewed after the barren cold season (just as life is renewed after death, or as last season’s grain is sown on the field). The implication is that present-day brahmins don’t even fulfill the rites of continuity in their own tradition, so how can they assert the continuity of caste over generations?

    Yesaṁ refers back to te of the previous portion, i.e. the seven brahmin seers, whose tradition modern brahmins are supposed to continue.

    ↩ mn93:18.71