Skip to content
True DhammaLibrary · Community
MN 35PTS MN 1.22714 min read

The Shorter Discourse With Saccaka

Cūḷasaccakasutta

Saccaka was a debater, who challenged the Buddha to a contest. Despite his bragging, the Buddha is not at all perturbed at his attacks.

Translated by Bhikkhu Sujato · Pāli: Mahāsaṅgīti Tipiṭaka · Public domain (CC0) via SuttaCentral

  • 0.1Majjhima Nikāya 35Middle Discourses 35

0.2CūḷasaccakasuttaThe Shorter Discourse With Saccaka

1.1Evaṁ me sutaṁ—So I have heard.1.2ekaṁ samayaṁ bhagavā vesāliyaṁ viharati mahāvane kūṭāgārasālāyaṁ.At one time the Buddha was staying near Vesālī, at the Great Wood, in the hall with the peaked roof.

2.1Tena kho pana samayena saccako nigaṇṭhaputto vesāliyaṁ paṭivasati bhassappavādako paṇḍitavādo sādhusammato bahujanassa.Now at that time Saccaka, the son of Jain parents, was staying in Vesālī. He was a controversialist who pretended to be astute and was deemed holy by many people.12.2So vesāliyaṁ parisati evaṁ vācaṁ bhāsati:He was telling a crowd in Vesālī,2.3“nāhaṁ taṁ passāmi samaṇaṁ vā brāhmaṇaṁ vā, saṅghiṁ gaṇiṁ gaṇācariyaṁ, api arahantaṁ sammāsambuddhaṁ paṭijānamānaṁ, yo mayā vādena vādaṁ samāraddho na saṅkampeyya na sampakampeyya na sampavedheyya, yassa na kacchehi sedā mucceyyuṁ.“I don’t see any ascetic or brahmin who would not shake and rock and tremble, sweating from the armpits, were I to take them on in debate—not a leader of an order or a community, or the tutor of a community, and not even one who claims to be a perfected one, a fully awakened Buddha.2.4Thūṇaṁ cepāhaṁ acetanaṁ vādena vādaṁ samārabheyyaṁ, sāpi mayā vādena vādaṁ samāraddhā saṅkampeyya sampakampeyya sampavedheyya.Even an insentient post would shake and rock and tremble were I to take it on in debate.2.5Ko pana vādo manussabhūtassā”ti?How much more then a human being!”

3.1PTS 1.228Atha kho āyasmā assaji pubbaṇhasamayaṁ nivāsetvā pattacīvaramādāya vesāliṁ piṇḍāya pāvisi.Then Venerable Assaji robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Vesālī for alms.23.2Addasā kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto vesāliyaṁ jaṅghāvihāraṁ anucaṅkamamāno anuvicaramāno āyasmantaṁ assajiṁ dūratova āgacchantaṁ.As Saccaka was going for a walk he saw Assaji coming off in the distance.3.3Disvāna yenāyasmā assaji tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā āyasmatā assajinā saddhiṁ sammodi.He approached him and exchanged greetings with him.

3.4Sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ aṭṭhāsi. Ekamantaṁ ṭhito kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto āyasmantaṁ assajiṁ etadavoca:When the greetings and polite conversation were over, Saccaka stood to one side and said to Assaji,4.1“kathaṁ pana, bho assaji, samaṇo gotamo sāvake vineti, kathaṁbhāgā ca pana samaṇassa gotamassa sāvakesu anusāsanī bahulā pavattatī”ti?“Worthy Assaji, how does the ascetic Gotama guide his disciples? And on what topics does instruction to his disciples generally proceed?”3

4.2“Evaṁ kho, aggivessana, bhagavā sāvake vineti, evaṁbhāgā ca pana bhagavato sāvakesu anusāsanī bahulā pavattati:“Aggivessana, this is how the Buddha guides his disciples, and his instructions to disciples generally proceed on these topics:44.3‘rūpaṁ, bhikkhave, aniccaṁ, vedanā aniccā, saññā aniccā, saṅkhārā aniccā, viññāṇaṁ aniccaṁ.‘Form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness are impermanent.54.4Rūpaṁ, bhikkhave, anattā, vedanā anattā, saññā anattā, saṅkhārā anattā, viññāṇaṁ anattā.Form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness are not-self.4.5Sabbe saṅkhārā aniccā, sabbe dhammā anattā’ti.All conditions are impermanent. All things are not-self.’4.6Evaṁ kho, aggivessana, bhagavā sāvake vineti, evaṁbhāgā ca pana bhagavato sāvakesu anusāsanī bahulā pavattatī”ti.This is how the Buddha guides his disciples, and how instruction to his disciples generally proceeds.”6

4.7“Dussutaṁ vata, bho assaji, assumha ye mayaṁ evaṁvādiṁ samaṇaṁ gotamaṁ assumha.“It’s sad to hear, worthy Assaji, that the ascetic Gotama has such a doctrine.4.8Appeva nāma mayaṁ kadāci karahaci tena bhotā gotamena saddhiṁ samāgaccheyyāma, appeva nāma siyā kocideva kathāsallāpo, appeva nāma tasmā pāpakā diṭṭhigatā viveceyyāmā”ti.Hopefully, some time or other I’ll get to meet the worthy Gotama, and we can have a discussion. And hopefully I can dissuade him from this harmful misconception.”

5.1PTS 1.229Tena kho pana samayena pañcamattāni licchavisatāni santhāgāre sannipatitāni honti kenacideva karaṇīyena.Now at that time around five hundred Licchavis were sitting together at the town hall on some business.75.2Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto yena te licchavī tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā te licchavī etadavoca:Then Saccaka went up to them and said,5.3“abhikkamantu bhonto licchavī, abhikkamantu bhonto licchavī, ajja me samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ kathāsallāpo bhavissati.“Come forth, good Licchavīs, come forth! Today I am going to have a discussion with the ascetic Gotama.5.4Sace me samaṇo gotamo tathā patiṭṭhissati yathā ca me ñātaññatarena sāvakena assajinā nāma bhikkhunā patiṭṭhitaṁ, seyyathāpi nāma balavā puriso dīghalomikaṁ eḷakaṁ lomesu gahetvā ākaḍḍheyya parikaḍḍheyya samparikaḍḍheyya;If he stands by the position stated to me by one of his well-known disciples—a mendicant named Assaji—I’ll take him on in debate and drag him to and fro and round about, like a strong man would grab a fleecy sheep and drag it to and fro and round about!5.5evamevāhaṁ samaṇaṁ gotamaṁ vādena vādaṁ ākaḍḍhissāmi parikaḍḍhissāmi samparikaḍḍhissāmi.5.6Seyyathāpi nāma balavā soṇḍikākammakāro mahantaṁ soṇḍikākiḷañjaṁ gambhīre udakarahade pakkhipitvā kaṇṇe gahetvā ākaḍḍheyya parikaḍḍheyya samparikaḍḍheyya;Taking him on in debate, I’ll drag him to and fro and round about, like a strong brewer’s worker would toss a large brewer’s sieve into a deep lake, grab it by the corners, and drag it to and fro and round about!5.7evamevāhaṁ samaṇaṁ gotamaṁ vādena vādaṁ ākaḍḍhissāmi parikaḍḍhissāmi samparikaḍḍhissāmi.5.8Seyyathāpi nāma balavā soṇḍikādhutto vālaṁ kaṇṇe gahetvā odhuneyya niddhuneyya nipphoṭeyya;Taking him on in debate, I’ll shake him down and about, and give him a beating, like a strong brewer’s mixer would grab a strainer by the corners and shake it down and about, and give it a beating!85.9evamevāhaṁ samaṇaṁ gotamaṁ vādena vādaṁ odhunissāmi niddhunissāmi nipphoṭessāmi.5.10Seyyathāpi nāma kuñjaro saṭṭhihāyano gambhīraṁ pokkharaṇiṁ ogāhetvā sāṇadhovikaṁ nāma kīḷitajātaṁ kīḷati;I’ll play a game of hemp-washing with the ascetic Gotama, like a sixty-year-old elephant would plunge into a deep lotus pond and play a game of hemp-washing!95.11evamevāhaṁ samaṇaṁ gotamaṁ sāṇadhovikaṁ maññe kīḷitajātaṁ kīḷissāmi.5.12Abhikkamantu bhonto licchavī, abhikkamantu bhonto licchavī, ajja me samaṇena gotamena saddhiṁ kathāsallāpo bhavissatī”ti.Come forth, good Licchavīs, come forth! Today I am going to have a discussion with the ascetic Gotama.”

6.1Tatrekacce licchavī evamāhaṁsu:At that, some of the Licchavis said,6.2“kiṁ samaṇo gotamo saccakassa nigaṇṭhaputtassa vādaṁ āropessati, atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto samaṇassa gotamassa vādaṁ āropessatī”ti?“How can the ascetic Gotama refute Saccaka’s doctrine, when it is Saccaka who will refute Gotama’s doctrine?”

6.3Ekacce licchavī evamāhaṁsu:But some of the Licchavis said,6.4“kiṁ so bhavamāno saccako nigaṇṭhaputto yo bhagavato vādaṁ āropessati, atha kho bhagavā saccakassa nigaṇṭhaputtassa vādaṁ āropessatī”ti?“Who is Saccaka to refute the Buddha’s doctrine, when it is the Buddha who will refute Saccaka’s doctrine?”

6.5Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto pañcamattehi licchavisatehi parivuto yena mahāvanaṁ kūṭāgārasālā tenupasaṅkami.Then Saccaka, escorted by the five hundred Licchavis, went to the hall with the peaked roof in the Great Wood.

7.1Tena kho pana samayena sambahulā bhikkhū abbhokāse caṅkamanti.At that time several mendicants were walking mindfully in the open air.7.2Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto yena te bhikkhū tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā te bhikkhū etadavoca:Then Saccaka went up to them and said,7.3“kahaṁ nu kho, bho, etarahi so bhavaṁ gotamo viharati?“Good fellows, where is the worthy Gotama at present?7.4Dassanakāmā hi mayaṁ taṁ bhavantaṁ gotaman”ti.For we want to see him.”

7.5“Esa, aggivessana, bhagavā mahāvanaṁ ajjhogāhetvā aññatarasmiṁ rukkhamūle divāvihāraṁ nisinno”ti.“Aggivessana, the Buddha has plunged deep into the Great Wood and is sitting at the root of a tree for the day’s meditation.”

8.1Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto mahatiyā licchaviparisāya saddhiṁ mahāvanaṁ ajjhogāhetvā yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā bhagavatā saddhiṁ sammodi.Then Saccaka, together with a large group of Licchavis, went to the Buddha in the Great Wood, and exchanged greetings with him.8.2Sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi.When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side.8.3Tepi kho licchavī appekacce bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdiṁsu, appekacce bhagavatā saddhiṁ sammodiṁsu, sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ nisīdiṁsu. Appekacce yena bhagavā tenañjaliṁ paṇāmetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdiṁsu, appekacce bhagavato santike nāmagottaṁ sāvetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdiṁsu, appekacce tuṇhībhūtā ekamantaṁ nisīdiṁsu.Before sitting down to one side, some of the Licchavīs bowed, some exchanged greetings and polite conversation, some held up their cupped palms toward the Buddha, some announced their name and clan, while some kept silent.

9.1PTS 1.230Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:Then Saccaka said to the Buddha,9.2“puccheyyāhaṁ bhavantaṁ gotamaṁ kiñcideva desaṁ, sace me bhavaṁ gotamo okāsaṁ karoti pañhassa veyyākaraṇāyā”ti.“I’d like to ask the worthy Gotama about a certain point, if you’d take the time to answer.”

9.3“Puccha, aggivessana, yadākaṅkhasī”ti.“Ask what you wish, Aggivessana.”

9.4“Kathaṁ pana bhavaṁ gotamo sāvake vineti, kathaṁbhāgā ca pana bhoto gotamassa sāvakesu anusāsanī bahulā pavattatī”ti?“How does the worthy Gotama guide his disciples? And on what topics does instruction to his disciples generally proceed?”

9.5“Evaṁ kho ahaṁ, aggivessana, sāvake vinemi, evaṁbhāgā ca pana me sāvakesu anusāsanī bahulā pavattati:“This is how I guide my disciples, and my instructions to disciples generally proceed on these topics:109.6‘rūpaṁ, bhikkhave, aniccaṁ, vedanā aniccā, saññā aniccā, saṅkhārā aniccā, viññāṇaṁ aniccaṁ.‘Form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness are impermanent.9.7Rūpaṁ, bhikkhave, anattā, vedanā anattā, saññā anattā, saṅkhārā anattā, viññāṇaṁ anattā.Form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness are not-self.9.8Sabbe saṅkhārā aniccā, sabbe dhammā anattā’ti.All conditions are impermanent. All things are not-self.’9.9Evaṁ kho ahaṁ, aggivessana, sāvake vinemi, evaṁbhāgā ca pana me sāvakesu anusāsanī bahulā pavattatī”ti.This is how I guide my disciples, and how instruction to my disciples generally proceeds.”

10.1“Upamā maṁ, bho gotama, paṭibhātī”ti.“A simile strikes me, worthy Gotama.”

10.2“Paṭibhātu taṁ, aggivessanā”ti bhagavā avoca.“Then speak as you feel inspired,” said the Buddha.

10.3“Seyyathāpi, bho gotama, ye kecime bījagāmabhūtagāmā vuddhiṁ virūḷhiṁ vepullaṁ āpajjanti, sabbe te pathaviṁ nissāya pathaviyaṁ patiṭṭhāya.“All the plants and seeds that achieve growth, increase, and maturity do so depending on the earth and grounded on the earth.1110.4Evamete bījagāmabhūtagāmā vuddhiṁ virūḷhiṁ vepullaṁ āpajjanti.10.5Seyyathāpi vā pana, bho gotama, ye kecime balakaraṇīyā kammantā karīyanti, sabbe te pathaviṁ nissāya pathaviyaṁ patiṭṭhāya.All the hard work that gets done depends on the earth and is grounded on the earth.10.6Evamete balakaraṇīyā kammantā karīyanti.

10.7Evameva kho, bho gotama, rūpattāyaṁ purisapuggalo rūpe patiṭṭhāya puññaṁ vā apuññaṁ vā pasavati, vedanattāyaṁ purisapuggalo vedanāyaṁ patiṭṭhāya puññaṁ vā apuññaṁ vā pasavati, saññattāyaṁ purisapuggalo saññāyaṁ patiṭṭhāya puññaṁ vā apuññaṁ vā pasavati, saṅkhārattāyaṁ purisapuggalo saṅkhāresu patiṭṭhāya puññaṁ vā apuññaṁ vā pasavati, viññāṇattāyaṁ purisapuggalo viññāṇe patiṭṭhāya puññaṁ vā apuññaṁ vā pasavatī”ti.In the same way, an individual person’s self is form. Established on form they brim with merit and wickedness. An individual person’s self is feeling … perception … choices … consciousness. Established on consciousness they brim with merit and wickedness.”12

11.1“Nanu tvaṁ, aggivessana, evaṁ vadesi:“Aggivessana, are you not saying this:11.2‘rūpaṁ me attā, vedanā me attā, saññā me attā, saṅkhārā me attā, viññāṇaṁ me attā’”ti?‘Form is my self, feeling is my self, perception is my self, choices are my self, consciousness is my self’?”

11.3“Ahañhi, bho gotama, evaṁ vadāmi:“Indeed, worthy Gotama, that is what I am saying.11.4‘rūpaṁ me attā, vedanā me attā, saññā me attā, saṅkhārā me attā, viññāṇaṁ me attā’ti, ayañca mahatī janatā”ti.And this big crowd agrees with me!”

11.5“Kiñhi te, aggivessana, mahatī janatā karissati?“What has this big crowd to do with you?11.6Iṅgha tvaṁ, aggivessana, sakaññeva vādaṁ nibbeṭhehī”ti.Please just unpack your own statement.”

11.7“Ahañhi, bho gotama, evaṁ vadāmi:“Then, worthy Gotama, what I am saying is this:11.8‘rūpaṁ me attā, vedanā me attā, saññā me attā, saṅkhārā me attā, viññāṇaṁ me attā’”ti.‘Form is my self, feeling is my self, perception is my self, choices are my self, consciousness is my self’.”

12.1PTS 1.231“Tena hi, aggivessana, taññevettha paṭipucchissāmi, yathā te khameyya tathā naṁ byākareyyāsi.“Well then, Aggivessana, I’ll ask you about this in return, and you can answer as you like.12.2Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,What do you think, Aggivessana?12.3vatteyya rañño khattiyassa muddhāvasittassa sakasmiṁ vijite vaso—Consider an anointed aristocratic king such as Pasenadi of Kosala or Ajātasattu of Magadha, son of the princess of Videha.12.4ghātetāyaṁ vā ghātetuṁ, jāpetāyaṁ vā jāpetuṁ, pabbājetāyaṁ vā pabbājetuṁ, seyyathāpi rañño pasenadissa kosalassa, seyyathāpi vā pana rañño māgadhassa ajātasattussa vedehiputtassā”ti?Would they have the power in their own realm to execute those who have incurred execution, fine those who have incurred fines, or banish those who have incurred banishment?”13

12.5“Vatteyya, bho gotama, rañño khattiyassa muddhāvasittassa sakasmiṁ vijite vaso—“An anointed king would have such power, worthy Gotama.12.6ghātetāyaṁ vā ghātetuṁ, jāpetāyaṁ vā jāpetuṁ, pabbājetāyaṁ vā pabbājetuṁ, seyyathāpi rañño pasenadissa kosalassa, seyyathāpi vā pana rañño māgadhassa ajātasattussa vedehiputtassa.12.7Imesampi hi, bho gotama, saṅghānaṁ gaṇānaṁ—Even federations such as the12.8Seyyathidaṁ—vajjīnaṁ mallānaṁ—Vajjis and Mallas12.9vattati sakasmiṁ vijite vaso—have such power in their own realm.1412.10ghātetāyaṁ vā ghātetuṁ, jāpetāyaṁ vā jāpetuṁ, pabbājetāyaṁ vā pabbājetuṁ.12.11Kiṁ pana rañño khattiyassa muddhāvasittassa, seyyathāpi rañño pasenadissa kosalassa, seyyathāpi vā pana rañño māgadhassa ajātasattussa vedehiputtassa?So of course an anointed king such as Pasenadi or Ajātasattu12.12Vatteyya, bho gotama, vattituñca marahatī”ti.would wield such power, as is their right.”15

13.1“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,“What do you think, Aggivessana?13.2yaṁ tvaṁ evaṁ vadesi:When you say,13.3‘rūpaṁ me attā’ti, vattati te tasmiṁ rūpe vaso—‘Form is my self,’ do you have power over that form to say:13.4evaṁ me rūpaṁ hotu, evaṁ me rūpaṁ mā ahosī”ti?‘May my form be like this! May it not be like that’?”1613.5Evaṁ vutte, saccako nigaṇṭhaputto tuṇhī ahosi.When he said this, Saccaka kept silent.13.6Dutiyampi kho bhagavā saccakaṁ nigaṇṭhaputtaṁ etadavoca:The Buddha asked the question a second time,13.7“taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana, yaṁ tvaṁ evaṁ vadesi:13.8‘rūpaṁ me attā’ti, vattati te tasmiṁ rūpe vaso—13.9evaṁ me rūpaṁ hotu, evaṁ me rūpaṁ mā ahosī”ti?13.10Dutiyampi kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto tuṇhī ahosi.but Saccaka still kept silent.13.11Atha kho bhagavā saccakaṁ nigaṇṭhaputtaṁ etadavoca:So the Buddha said to Saccaka,13.12“byākarohi dāni, aggivessana, na dāni te tuṇhībhāvassa kālo.“Answer now, Aggivessana. Now is not the time for silence.13.13Yo koci, aggivessana tathāgatena yāvatatiyaṁ sahadhammikaṁ pañhaṁ puṭṭho na byākaroti, etthevassa sattadhā muddhā phalatī”ti.If someone fails to answer a legitimate question when asked three times by the Buddha, their head explodes into seven pieces there and then.”17

14.1PTS 1.232Tena kho pana samayena vajirapāṇi yakkho āyasaṁ vajiraṁ ādāya ādittaṁ sampajjalitaṁ sajotibhūtaṁ saccakassa nigaṇṭhaputtassa uparivehāsaṁ ṭhito hoti:Now at that time the spirit Vajirapāṇī, taking up a burning iron thunderbolt, blazing and glowing, stood in the air above Saccaka, thinking,1814.2“sacāyaṁ saccako nigaṇṭhaputto bhagavatā yāvatatiyaṁ sahadhammikaṁ pañhaṁ puṭṭho na byākarissati etthevassa sattadhā muddhaṁ phālessāmī”ti.“If this Saccaka doesn’t answer when asked a third time, I’ll blow his head into seven pieces there and then!”14.3Taṁ kho pana vajirapāṇiṁ yakkhaṁ bhagavā ceva passati saccako ca nigaṇṭhaputto.And both the Buddha and Saccaka could see Vajirapāṇī.

14.4Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto bhīto saṁviggo lomahaṭṭhajāto bhagavantaṁyeva tāṇaṁ gavesī bhagavantaṁyeva leṇaṁ gavesī bhagavantaṁyeva saraṇaṁ gavesī bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:Saccaka was terrified, shocked, and awestruck. Looking to the Buddha for shelter, asylum, and refuge, he said,14.5“pucchatu maṁ bhavaṁ gotamo, byākarissāmī”ti.“Ask me, worthy Gotama. I will answer.”

15.1“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,“What do you think, Aggivessana?15.2yaṁ tvaṁ evaṁ vadesi:When you say,15.3‘rūpaṁ me attā’ti, vattati te tasmiṁ rūpe vaso—‘Form is my self,’ do you have power over that form to say:15.4evaṁ me rūpaṁ hotu, evaṁ me rūpaṁ mā ahosī”ti?‘May my form be like this! May it not be like that’?”

15.5“No hidaṁ, bho gotama”.“No, worthy Gotama.”

16.1“Manasi karohi, aggivessana;“Think about it, Aggivessana!1916.2manasi karitvā kho, aggivessana, byākarohi.You should think before answering.16.3Na kho te sandhiyati purimena vā pacchimaṁ pacchimena vā purimaṁ.What you said before and what you said after don’t match up.16.4Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,What do you think, Aggivessana?16.5yaṁ tvaṁ evaṁ vadesi:When you say,16.6‘vedanā me attā’ti, vattati te tissaṁ vedanāyaṁ vaso—‘Feeling is my self,’ do you have power over that feeling to say:16.7evaṁ me vedanā hotu, evaṁ me vedanā mā ahosī”ti?‘May my feeling be like this! May it not be like that’?”

16.8“No hidaṁ, bho gotama”.“No, worthy Gotama.”

17.1“Manasi karohi, aggivessana;“Think about it, Aggivessana!17.2manasi karitvā kho, aggivessana, byākarohi.You should think before answering.17.3Na kho te sandhiyati purimena vā pacchimaṁ, pacchimena vā purimaṁ.What you said before and what you said after don’t match up.17.4Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,What do you think, Aggivessana?17.5yaṁ tvaṁ evaṁ vadesi:When you say,17.6‘saññā me attā’ti, vattati te tissaṁ saññāyaṁ vaso—‘Perception is my self,’ do you have power over that perception to say:17.7evaṁ me saññā hotu, evaṁ me saññā mā ahosī”ti?‘May my perception be like this! May it not be like that’?”

17.8“No hidaṁ, bho gotama”.“No, worthy Gotama.”

18.1“Manasi karohi, aggivessana;“Think about it, Aggivessana!18.2manasi karitvā kho, aggivessana, byākarohi.You should think before answering.18.3Na kho te sandhiyati purimena vā pacchimaṁ, pacchimena vā purimaṁ.What you said before and what you said after don’t match up.18.4Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,What do you think, Aggivessana?18.5yaṁ tvaṁ evaṁ vadesi:When you say,18.6‘saṅkhārā me attā’ti, vattati te tesu saṅkhāresu vaso—‘Choices are my self,’ do you have power over those choices to say:18.7evaṁ me saṅkhārā hontu, evaṁ me saṅkhārā mā ahesun”ti?‘May my choices be like this! May they not be like that’?”

18.8“No hidaṁ, bho gotama”.“No, worthy Gotama.”

19.1“Manasi karohi, aggivessana;“Think about it, Aggivessana!19.2manasi karitvā kho, aggivessana, byākarohi.You should think before answering.19.3Na kho te sandhiyati purimena vā pacchimaṁ, pacchimena vā purimaṁ.What you said before and what you said after don’t match up.19.4Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,What do you think, Aggivessana?19.5yaṁ tvaṁ evaṁ vadesi:When you say,19.6‘viññāṇaṁ me attā’ti, vattati te tasmiṁ viññāṇe vaso—‘Consciousness is my self,’ do you have power over that consciousness to say:19.7evaṁ me viññāṇaṁ hotu, evaṁ me viññāṇaṁ mā ahosī”ti?‘May my consciousness be like this! May it not be like that’?”

19.8“No hidaṁ, bho gotama”.“No, worthy Gotama.”

20.1PTS 1.233“Manasi karohi, aggivessana;“Think about it, Aggivessana!20.2manasi karitvā kho, aggivessana, byākarohi.You should think before answering.20.3Na kho te sandhiyati purimena vā pacchimaṁ, pacchimena vā purimaṁ.What you said before and what you said after don’t match up.20.4Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,What do you think, Aggivessana?20.5rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?Is form permanent or impermanent?”

20.6“Aniccaṁ, bho gotama”.“Impermanent.”

20.7“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”20

20.8“Dukkhaṁ, bho gotama”.“Suffering.”

20.9“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ:“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:20.10‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”21

20.11“No hidaṁ, bho gotama”.“No, worthy Gotama.”

20.12“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,“What do you think, Aggivessana?20.13vedanā …pe…Is feeling …20.14saññā …pe…perception …20.15saṅkhārā …pe…choices …20.16taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana, viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?consciousness permanent or impermanent?”

20.17“Aniccaṁ, bho gotama”.“Impermanent.”

20.18“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”

20.19“Dukkhaṁ, bho gotama”.“Suffering.”

20.20“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, kallaṁ nu taṁ samanupassituṁ:“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:20.21‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’”ti?‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”

20.22“No hidaṁ, bho gotama”.“No, worthy Gotama.”

21.1“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,“What do you think, Aggivessana?21.2yo nu kho dukkhaṁ allīno dukkhaṁ upagato dukkhaṁ ajjhosito, dukkhaṁ ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’ti samanupassati, api nu kho so sāmaṁ vā dukkhaṁ parijāneyya, dukkhaṁ vā parikkhepetvā vihareyyā”ti?Consider someone who resorts, draws near, and clings to suffering, regarding it thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self.’ Would they be able to completely understand suffering themselves, or live having wiped out suffering?”

21.3“Kiñhi siyā, bho gotama?“How could they?21.4No hidaṁ, bho gotamā”ti.No, worthy Gotama.”

21.5“Taṁ kiṁ maññasi, aggivessana,“What do you think, Aggivessana?21.6nanu tvaṁ evaṁ sante dukkhaṁ allīno dukkhaṁ upagato dukkhaṁ ajjhosito, dukkhaṁ:This being so, aren’t you someone who resorts, draws near, and clings to suffering, regarding it thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”21.7‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’ti samanupassasī”ti?

21.8“Kiñhi no siyā, bho gotama?“How could I not?21.9Evametaṁ, bho gotamā”ti.Yes, worthy Gotama.”

22.1PTS 1.234“Seyyathāpi, aggivessana, puriso sāratthiko sāragavesī sārapariyesanaṁ caramāno tiṇhaṁ kuṭhāriṁ ādāya vanaṁ paviseyya.“Suppose, Aggivessana, there was a person in need of heartwood. Wandering in search of heartwood, they’d take a sharp axe and enter a forest.22.2So tattha passeyya mahantaṁ kadalikkhandhaṁ ujuṁ navaṁ akukkukajātaṁ.There they’d see a big banana trunk, straight and young and grown unskewed.22.3Tamenaṁ mūle chindeyya, mūle chetvā agge chindeyya, agge chetvā pattavaṭṭiṁ vinibbhujeyya.They’d cut it down at the base, cut off the top, and unroll the coiled sheaths.22.4So tattha pattavaṭṭiṁ vinibbhujanto pheggumpi nādhigaccheyya, kuto sāraṁ?But they wouldn’t even find sapwood, much less heartwood.

22.5Evameva kho tvaṁ, aggivessana, mayā sakasmiṁ vāde samanuyuñjiyamāno samanugāhiyamāno samanubhāsiyamāno ritto tuccho aparaddho.In the same way, when pursued, pressed, and grilled by me on your own doctrine, you turn out to be vacuous, hollow, and mistaken.22.6Bhāsitā kho pana te esā, aggivessana, vesāliyaṁ parisati vācā:But it was you who stated before the assembly of Vesālī:22.7‘nāhaṁ taṁ passāmi samaṇaṁ vā brāhmaṇaṁ vā, saṅghiṁ gaṇiṁ gaṇācariyaṁ, api arahantaṁ sammāsambuddhaṁ paṭijānamānaṁ, yo mayā vādena vādaṁ samāraddho na saṅkampeyya na sampakampeyya na sampavedheyya, yassa na kacchehi sedā mucceyyuṁ.‘I don’t see any ascetic or brahmin who would not shake and rock and tremble, sweating from the armpits, were I to take them on in debate—not a leader of an order or a community, or the tutor of a community, and not even one who claims to be a perfected one, a fully awakened Buddha.22.8Thūṇaṁ cepāhaṁ acetanaṁ vādena vādaṁ samārabheyyaṁ sāpi mayā vādena vādaṁ samāraddhā saṅkampeyya sampakampeyya sampavedheyya.Even an insentient post would shake and rock and tremble were I to take it on in debate.22.9Ko pana vādo manussabhūtassā’ti?How much more then a human being!’22.10Tuyhaṁ kho pana, aggivessana, appekaccāni sedaphusitāni nalāṭā muttāni, uttarāsaṅgaṁ vinibhinditvā bhūmiyaṁ patiṭṭhitāni.But sweat is pouring from your forehead; it’s soaked through your robe and drips on the ground.2222.11Mayhaṁ kho pana, aggivessana, natthi etarahi kāyasmiṁ sedo”ti.While I now have no sweat on my body.”22.12Iti bhagavā tasmiṁ parisati suvaṇṇavaṇṇaṁ kāyaṁ vivari.So the Buddha revealed his golden body to the assembly.22.13Evaṁ vutte, saccako nigaṇṭhaputto tuṇhībhūto maṅkubhūto pattakkhandho adhomukho pajjhāyanto appaṭibhāno nisīdi.When this was said, Saccaka sat silent, dismayed, shoulders drooping, downcast, depressed, with nothing to say.

23.1Atha kho dummukho licchaviputto saccakaṁ nigaṇṭhaputtaṁ tuṇhībhūtaṁ maṅkubhūtaṁ pattakkhandhaṁ adhomukhaṁ pajjhāyantaṁ appaṭibhānaṁ viditvā bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:Knowing this, the Licchavi Dummukha said to the Buddha,2323.2“upamā maṁ, bhagavā, paṭibhātī”ti.“A simile strikes me, Blessed One.”

23.3“Paṭibhātu taṁ, dummukhā”ti bhagavā avoca.“Then speak as you feel inspired,” said the Buddha.

23.4“Seyyathāpi, bhante, gāmassa vā nigamassa vā avidūre pokkharaṇī.“Sir, suppose there was a lotus pond not far from a town or village,2423.5Tatrāssa kakkaṭako.and a crab lived there.23.6Atha kho, bhante, sambahulā kumārakā vā kumārikā vā tamhā gāmā vā nigamā vā nikkhamitvā yena sā pokkharaṇī tenupasaṅkameyyuṁ; upasaṅkamitvā taṁ pokkharaṇiṁ ogāhetvā taṁ kakkaṭakaṁ udakā uddharitvā thale patiṭṭhāpeyyuṁ.Then several boys or girls would leave the town or village and go to the pond, where they’d pull out the crab and put it on solid ground.23.7Yaññadeva hi so, bhante, kakkaṭako aḷaṁ abhininnāmeyya taṁ tadeva te kumārakā vā kumārikā vā kaṭṭhena vā kathalena vā sañchindeyyuṁ sambhañjeyyuṁ sampalibhañjeyyuṁ.Whenever that crab extended a claw, those boys or girls would snap, crack, and break it off with a stick or a stone.2523.8Evañhi so, bhante, kakkaṭako sabbehi aḷehi sañchinnehi sambhaggehi sampalibhaggehi abhabbo taṁ pokkharaṇiṁ puna otarituṁ, seyyathāpi pubbe.And when that crab’s claws had all been snapped, cracked, and broken off it wouldn’t be able to return down into that lotus pond.23.9Evameva kho, bhante, yāni saccakassa nigaṇṭhaputtassa visūkāyitāni visevitāni vipphanditāni tānipi sabbāni bhagavatā sañchinnāni sambhaggāni sampalibhaggāni;In the same way, sir, the Buddha has snapped, cracked, and broken off all Saccaka’s twists, ducks, and dodges.23.10abhabbo ca dāni, bhante, saccako nigaṇṭhaputto puna bhagavantaṁ upasaṅkamituṁ yadidaṁ vādādhippāyo”ti.Now he can’t get near the Buddha again looking for a debate.”

24.1Evaṁ vutte, saccako nigaṇṭhaputto dummukhaṁ licchaviputtaṁ etadavoca:But Saccaka said to him,24.2“āgamehi tvaṁ, dummukha, āgamehi tvaṁ, dummukha, (…) na mayaṁ tayā saddhiṁ mantema, idha mayaṁ bhotā gotamena saddhiṁ mantema.“Hold on, Dummukha, hold on! I wasn’t talking with you, I was talking with the worthy Gotama.

24.3PTS 1.235Tiṭṭhatesā, bho gotama, amhākañceva aññesañca puthusamaṇabrāhmaṇānaṁ vācā.Worthy Gotama, leave aside that statement I made—as did various other ascetics and brahmins—24.4Vilāpaṁ vilapitaṁ maññe.it was, like, just a bit of nonsense.2624.5Kittāvatā ca nu kho bhoto gotamassa sāvako sāsanakaro hoti ovādapatikaro tiṇṇavicikiccho vigatakathaṅkatho vesārajjappatto aparappaccayo satthusāsane viharatī”ti?How do you define a disciple of the worthy Gotama who follows instructions and responds to advice; who has gone beyond doubt, got rid of indecision, gained assurance, and is independent of others in the Teacher’s instructions?”

24.6“Idha, aggivessana, mama sāvako yaṁ kiñci rūpaṁ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṁ ajjhattaṁ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṁ vā sukhumaṁ vā hīnaṁ vā paṇītaṁ vā yaṁ dūre santike vā, sabbaṁ rūpaṁ ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti evametaṁ yathābhūtaṁ sammappaññāya passati;“It’s when one of my disciples truly sees any kind of form at all—past, future, or present; internal or external; solid or subtle; inferior or superior; far or near: <em>all</em> form—with right understanding: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’2724.7yā kāci vedanā …pe…They truly see any kind of feeling …24.8yā kāci saññā …pe…perception …24.9ye keci saṅkhārā …pe…choices …24.10yaṁ kiñci viññāṇaṁ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṁ ajjhattaṁ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṁ vā sukhumaṁ vā hīnaṁ vā paṇītaṁ vā, yaṁ dūre santike vā, sabbaṁ viññāṇaṁ ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti evametaṁ yathābhūtaṁ sammappaññāya passati.consciousness at all—past, future, or present; internal or external; solid or subtle; inferior or superior; far or near: <em>all</em> consciousness—with right understanding: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’24.11Ettāvatā kho, aggivessana, mama sāvako sāsanakaro hoti ovādapatikaro tiṇṇavicikiccho vigatakathaṅkatho vesārajjappatto aparappaccayo satthusāsane viharatī”ti.That’s how to define one of my disciples who follows instructions and responds to advice; who has gone beyond doubt, got rid of indecision, gained assurance, and is independent of others in the Teacher’s instructions.”

25.1“Kittāvatā pana, bho gotama, bhikkhu arahaṁ hoti khīṇāsavo vusitavā katakaraṇīyo ohitabhāro anuppattasadattho parikkhīṇabhavasaṁyojano sammadaññāvimutto”ti?“But how do you define a mendicant who is a perfected one, with defilements ended, who has completed the spiritual journey, done what had to be done, laid down the burden, achieved their heart’s goal, utterly ended the fetter of continued existence, and is rightly freed through enlightenment?”

25.2“Idha, aggivessana, bhikkhu yaṁ kiñci rūpaṁ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṁ ajjhattaṁ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṁ vā sukhumaṁ vā hīnaṁ vā paṇītaṁ vā yaṁ dūre santike vā sabbaṁ rūpaṁ ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti evametaṁ yathābhūtaṁ sammappaññāya disvā anupādā vimutto hoti;“It’s when a mendicant truly sees any kind of form at all—past, future, or present; internal or external; solid or subtle; inferior or superior; far or near: <em>all</em> form—with right understanding: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ And having seen this with right understanding they’re freed by not grasping.25.3yā kāci vedanā …pe…They truly see any kind of feeling …25.4yā kāci saññā …pe…perception …25.5ye keci saṅkhārā …pe…choices …25.6yaṁ kiñci viññāṇaṁ atītānāgatapaccuppannaṁ ajjhattaṁ vā bahiddhā vā oḷārikaṁ vā sukhumaṁ vā hīnaṁ vā paṇītaṁ vā yaṁ dūre santike vā sabbaṁ viññāṇaṁ ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti evametaṁ yathābhūtaṁ sammappaññāya disvā anupādā vimutto hoti.consciousness at all—past, future, or present; internal or external; solid or subtle; inferior or superior; far or near: <em>all</em> consciousness—with right understanding: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ And having seen this with right understanding they’re freed by not grasping.25.7Ettāvatā kho, aggivessana, bhikkhu arahaṁ hoti khīṇāsavo vusitavā katakaraṇīyo ohitabhāro anuppattasadattho parikkhīṇabhavasaṁyojano sammadaññāvimutto.That’s how to define a mendicant who is a perfected one, with defilements ended, who has completed the spiritual journey, done what had to be done, laid down the burden, achieved their heart’s goal, utterly ended the fetter of continued existence, and is rightly freed through enlightenment.

26.1Evaṁ vimuttacitto kho, aggivessana, bhikkhu tīhi anuttariyehi samannāgato hoti—A mendicant whose mind is freed like this has three unsurpassable qualities:26.2dassanānuttariyena, paṭipadānuttariyena, vimuttānuttariyena.unsurpassable seeing, practice, and freedom.2826.3Evaṁ vimuttacitto kho, aggivessana, bhikkhu tathāgataññeva sakkaroti garuṁ karoti māneti pūjeti—They honor, respect, esteem, and venerate only the Realized One:26.4buddho so bhagavā bodhāya dhammaṁ deseti, danto so bhagavā damathāya dhammaṁ deseti, santo so bhagavā samathāya dhammaṁ deseti, tiṇṇo so bhagavā taraṇāya dhammaṁ deseti, parinibbuto so bhagavā parinibbānāya dhammaṁ desetī”ti.‘The Blessed One is awakened, tamed, serene, crossed over, and quenched. And he teaches Dhamma for awakening, self-control, serenity, crossing over, and extinguishment.’”

27.1PTS 1.236Evaṁ vutte, saccako nigaṇṭhaputto bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:When he had spoken, Saccaka said to him,27.2“mayameva, bho gotama, dhaṁsī, mayaṁ pagabbā, ye mayaṁ bhavantaṁ gotamaṁ vādena vādaṁ āsādetabbaṁ amaññimha.“Worthy Gotama, it was rude and impudent of me to imagine I could attack you in debate.27.3Siyā hi, bho gotama, hatthiṁ pabhinnaṁ āsajja purisassa sotthibhāvo, na tveva bhavantaṁ gotamaṁ āsajja siyā purisassa sotthibhāvo.For a person might find safety after attacking a rutting elephant, but not after attacking the worthy Gotama.27.4Siyā hi, bho gotama, pajjalitaṁ aggikkhandhaṁ āsajja purisassa sotthibhāvo, na tveva bhavantaṁ gotamaṁ āsajja siyā purisassa sotthibhāvo.A person might find safety after attacking a blazing mass of fire, but not after attacking the worthy Gotama.27.5Siyā hi, bho gotama, āsīvisaṁ ghoravisaṁ āsajja purisassa sotthibhāvo, na tveva bhavantaṁ gotamaṁ āsajja siyā purisassa sotthibhāvo.They might find safety after attacking a poisonous viper, but not after attacking the worthy Gotama.27.6Mayameva, bho gotama, dhaṁsī, mayaṁ pagabbā, ye mayaṁ bhavantaṁ gotamaṁ vādena vādaṁ āsādetabbaṁ amaññimha.It was rude and impudent of me to imagine I could attack you in debate.27.7Adhivāsetu me bhavaṁ gotamo svātanāya bhattaṁ saddhiṁ bhikkhusaṅghenā”ti.Would the worthy Gotama together with the mendicant Saṅgha please accept tomorrow’s meal from me?”27.8Adhivāsesi bhagavā tuṇhībhāvena.The Buddha consented with silence.

28.1PTS 1.237Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto bhagavato adhivāsanaṁ viditvā te licchavī āmantesi:Then, knowing that the Buddha had consented, Saccaka addressed those Licchavis,28.2“suṇantu me bhonto licchavī, samaṇo me gotamo nimantito svātanāya saddhiṁ bhikkhusaṅghena.“Listen, gentlemen. I have invited the ascetic Gotama together with the Saṅgha of mendicants for tomorrow’s meal.28.3Tena me abhihareyyātha yamassa patirūpaṁ maññeyyāthā”ti.You may all bring me what you think is suitable.”

29.1Atha kho te licchavī tassā rattiyā accayena saccakassa nigaṇṭhaputtassa pañcamattāni thālipākasatāni bhattābhihāraṁ abhihariṁsu.Then, when the night had passed, those Licchavis presented Saccaka with an offering of five hundred servings of food.2929.2Atha kho nigaṇṭhaputto sake ārāme paṇītaṁ khādanīyaṁ bhojanīyaṁ paṭiyādāpetvā bhagavato kālaṁ ārocāpesi:And Saccaka had delicious fresh and cooked foods prepared in his own park. Then he had the Buddha informed of the time, saying,29.3“kālo, bho gotama, niṭṭhitaṁ bhattan”ti.“It’s time, worthy Gotama, the meal is ready.”

30.1Atha kho bhagavā pubbaṇhasamayaṁ nivāsetvā pattacīvaramādāya yena saccakassa nigaṇṭhaputtassa ārāmo tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā paññatte āsane nisīdi saddhiṁ bhikkhusaṅghena.Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, went to Saccaka’s park, where he sat down on the seat spread out together with the Saṅgha of mendicants.30.2Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto buddhappamukhaṁ bhikkhusaṅghaṁ paṇītena khādanīyena bhojanīyena sahatthā santappesi sampavāresi.Then Saccaka served and satisfied the mendicant Saṅgha headed by the Buddha with his own hands with delicious fresh and cooked foods.30.3Atha kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto bhagavantaṁ bhuttāviṁ onītapattapāṇiṁ aññataraṁ nīcaṁ āsanaṁ gahetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi.When the Buddha had eaten and washed his hand and bowl, Saccaka took a low seat and sat to one side.

30.4Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho saccako nigaṇṭhaputto bhagavantaṁ etadavoca:Then Saccaka said to the Buddha,30.5“yamidaṁ, bho gotama, dāne puññañca puññamahī ca taṁ dāyakānaṁ sukhāya hotū”ti.“Worthy Gotama, may the merit and the growth of merit in this gift be for the happiness of the donors.”30

30.6“Yaṁ kho, aggivessana, tādisaṁ dakkhiṇeyyaṁ āgamma avītarāgaṁ avītadosaṁ avītamohaṁ, taṁ dāyakānaṁ bhavissati.“Aggivessana, whatever comes from giving to a recipient of a religious donation such as yourself—who is not free of greed, hate, and delusion—will accrue to the donors.3130.7Yaṁ kho, aggivessana, mādisaṁ dakkhiṇeyyaṁ āgamma vītarāgaṁ vītadosaṁ vītamohaṁ, taṁ tuyhaṁ bhavissatī”ti.Whatever comes from giving to a recipient of a religious donation such as myself—who is free of greed, hate, and delusion—will accrue to you.”

30.8Cūḷasaccakasuttaṁ niṭṭhitaṁ pañcamaṁ.

Translator’s notes

  1. Saccaka is called nigaṇṭhaputta, being the only person so described. The nigaṇṭhas (“knotless ones”) were Jain ascetics and their followers were nigaṇṭhasāvaka (SN 42.9:2.3). The commentary says he was the son of Jain parents. From the ending of this sutta, where he makes an offering of food, we can see he was not an ascetic, and from MN 36:48.11 it is clear he was not a Jain.

    This sutta includes a number of images, phrases, and allusions that appear reminiscent of the Brahmanical teacher Uddālaka Āruṇi, although none of the references are definitive. The bulk of Uddālaka’s teachings were to his son Śvetaketu, who became arrogant due to his learning (Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.1.2), paralleling Saccaka’s arrogance.

    ↩ mn35:2.1
  2. Assaji was one the group of five mendicants who received the Buddha’s first discourse (Kd 1:6.36.1). Shortly afterwards he inspired Sāriputta with a classic epitome of the teaching (Kd 1:23.2.1). Note that Sāriputta waited politely until almsround was complete before approaching, whereas Saccaka just goes right ahead. We hear of a grave illness Assaji suffered later (SN 22.88).

    Another Assaji, who is always paired with his friend Punabbasuka, was a lazy and indulgent monk (MN 70:4.1).

    ↩ mn35:3.1
  3. Sāvake vineti (“guide his disciples”) is typically used by non-Buddhists.

    The phrase kathaṁbhāgā (and its counterpart evaṁbhāgā in the next line) are unique. The literal sense is “with what portion”, and given the answer I think Saccaka is asking for a list of topics.

    ↩ mn35:4.1
  4. Saccaka is addressed with the Brahmanical clan name Aggivessana, probably after the lineage of his clan’s purohita, just as the Sakyans are called Gotama and the Mallas Vāseṭṭha. A Vajjiputta is referred to as Gotama at Thag 1.119.

    ↩ mn35:4.2
  5. The five aggregates are mentioned as if the listener is expected to know them.

    ↩ mn35:4.3
  6. Despite this, this teaching that omits “suffering” (dukkha) is not taught by the Buddha at all. It only appears in one other sutta, where it is spoken by the mendicants after the Buddha’s passing (SN 22.90:2.2; but see below at MN 35:9.5). Strikingly, both the current sutta and SN 22.90 share a common narrative pattern. In both cases, an interlocuter (Saccaka or Channa, both known for their conceit) asks for teaching from a lesser teacher (Assaji or unnamed mendicants). Their reply omits suffering, but this fails. So they seek a better teacher (the Buddha, Ānanda) who not only includes suffering, but specially emphasizes it (MN 35:21.2, SN 22.90:9.7). This teaching is successful. This narrative journey mirrors that of Śvetaketu, who studied with others for twelve years before being shown true wisdom by his father Uddālaka. If we are on the right track, the point of the narrative is that it is essential to include suffering. This suggests that the Chinese parallels (SA 110 at T ii 35b4 and EA 37.10 at T ii 715b4), which do include the characteristic of dukkha here, would be a product of later expansion and normalization.

    ↩ mn35:4.6
  7. The Licchavis, whose name is derived from “bear”, dominated the Vajji Federation.

    ↩ mn35:5.1
  8. ↩ mn35:5.8
  9. Hemp was beaten and washed in water before being woven into ropes or cloth. (Also at MN 56:7.10; see AN 10.99:3.4 for an elephant’s “ear-washing”.)

    ↩ mn35:5.10
  10. If, as I have argued, Assaji’s presentation is meant to be inadequate, why does the Buddha endorse it here? The Buddha commonly endorses answers given by disciples, and this could have been a product of editorial standardization. After all, it remains the fact that it simply is not true that the Buddha normally teaches in this way.

    ↩ mn35:9.5
  11. Saccaka argues by naturalistic analogy from singularity to plurality. Likewise Uddālaka, observing the natural world, pointed to the way that multiplicity emerges from singleness. When asked who he worships as self, Uddālaka answers the “earth”, which is said to be the “ground” (pratiṣṭhā, Chāndogya Upaniṣad 5.17); due to this worship he enjoys food and offspring. However, he points to water rather than earth as the origin of anna, which is (plant) food but also stands for solidity in general (6.2.4; see too 6.11.1–2).

    ↩ mn35:10.3
  12. Saccaka treats the five aggregates as categories for classifying the self. And indeed elsewhere, such as DN 1, we find various theorists describe the self as “form”, experiencing “feelings”, being “percipient”, etc. In identifying each of the five aggregates as self, Saccaka follows the method of “affirmation” whereby multiple phenomena are affirmed to be the self at deeper and deeper levels, in contrast with the method of “negation” where potential candidates for the self are denied until the final self is revealed. Uddālaka also preferred the method of affirmation, arguing that existence comes first and that the divinity pours itself in all the manifold forms of the world (Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.2.2ff.).

    Note Saccaka’s use of the term “individual person” (purisapuggala), for which see SN 22.22 and notes.

    ↩ mn35:10.7
  13. The Pali uses the future passive participle, sometimes interpreted as “deserving of execution”. But this would imply that the Buddha endorsed capital punishment, which is unsupported elsewhere and contradicts his ethical principles. Rather, read in its weaker literal sense, “execute those to be executed”, i.e. those who have been found guilty of a crime incurring capital punishment. It is an acknowledgment of the king’s powers, not an endorsement of them.

    ↩ mn35:12.4
  14. Saccaka cannily appeals to the Licchavis by asserting their right to rule.

    ↩ mn35:12.9
  15. Overstepping the Buddha’s position, Saccaka’s endorsement of capital punishment shows how far he has drifted from the non-violent doctrine of his Jain parents.

    ↩ mn35:12.12
  16. Also at SN 22.59:2.3. This responds to the “inner controller” (antaryāmin) of Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 3.7. Uddālaka learned this from the centaur Kabandha in Madra (near modern Islamabad). He challenges Yājñavalkya, who explains it as the self who lives in the midst of all things, unknown but knowing, controlling all from within.

    ↩ mn35:13.4
  17. The threat of losing one’s head is found at eg. Chāndogya Upaniṣad 1.8.6 and Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.3.24, or at 3.9.26 when it actually did fall off. I cannot trace the detail of heads being split in seven to any early Sanskrit texts, but it is found in later texts such as Rāmāyaṇa 7.26.44c and Mahābhārata 14.7.2c.

    ↩ mn35:13.13
  18. Vajirapāṇī (“lightning-bolt in hand”) appears here and in the parallel passage at DN 3:1.21.1. The synonymous Vajrahasta (Pali vajirahattha, DN 20:12.1) is a frequent epithet of Indra in the Vedas (eg. indro vajrahastaḥ, Rig Veda 1.173.10a), confirming the commentary’s identification with Sakka. Much later, Mahayana texts adopted the name for a fierce Bodhisattva who was protector of the Dhamma.

    ↩ mn35:14.1
  19. Here neither “attention” nor “focus” quite fits manasikāra. The Buddha is telling Saccaka to recollect an earlier statement when making a later one, i.e. to practice rationality.

    ↩ mn35:16.1
  20. Here the Buddha introduces “suffering”, despite its omission earlier.

    ↩ mn35:20.7
  21. This directly rejects all forms of self, but especially the highest conception of self as expressed in the Upaniṣads. Etaṁ mama occurs as mamedaṁ (“this is mine”, Maitrī Upaniṣad 3.2), which in context is a limited view of self. Eso’hamasmi is Yājñavalkya’s so’hamasmi (“I am that”, Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.4.1; BU 5.15.1 = Īśā Upaniṣad 16; Chāndogya Upaniṣad 4.11.1, 4.12.1, 4.13.1; Śāṅkhāyana Āraṇyaka 3.6), which Uddālaka’s tattvamasi puts in second person (Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.8.7). The same passage also parallels eso me attā with sa ātmā (“that is the self”), for which we also find eṣa ma ātmā (CU 3.14.3), and in the optative mood, ma idaṁ syād ātman (BU 1.2.7).

    ↩ mn35:20.10
  22. The oddly prominent role of sweat in the discourse finds its parallel in Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.2.3, where Uddālaka argues that existence (sat) produces fire (tejas) and fire produces water, which is why you sweat when hot.

    ↩ mn35:22.10
  23. Dummukha the Licchavi appears only here. The name, meaning “Ugly Face” seems odd, but it is also a term for a horse. A number of individuals of this name appear in Sanskritic literature, including one from Uddālaka’s home country of Pañcāla (Aitareya Brāhmaṇa 8.23).

    ↩ mn35:23.1
  24. The same simile appears at SN 4.24:8.1.

    ↩ mn35:23.4
  25. The crab “extends” a claw as a meditator after absorption “extends” the mind to insight (MN 4:27.1). See too the simile at SN 35.240.

    ↩ mn35:23.7
  26. Saccaka tries to wriggle out of his initial statement, just as modern trolls claim to speak in irony or humor.

    ↩ mn35:24.4
  27. This is the trainee (sekha). Knowing Saccaka’s attachment to his self theories, the Buddha frames his response with the standard passage on not-self.

    ↩ mn35:24.6
  28. Also at DN 33:1.10.119, which is doubtless lifted from the current passage. A list of six unsurpassables is found at AN 6.30, but the only common item is “seeing” (dassana), which is defined as seeing the Buddha and his disciples. Here “seeing” is either seeing the Buddha which gives rise to faith, or else “seeing” the four noble truths; practice is the noble eightfold path; and freedom is the result of that path, arahantship.

    As to why this unique set is chosen here, it is perhaps notable that three of the final similes of Uddālaka’s “subtlest” self (as above, MN 35:20.10) in the Chāndogya Upaniṣad speak of seeing (the kernel of a seed, 6.12.1–2), walking (from one village to the next, 6.14.2), and freedom (from punishment, 6.16.2).

    ↩ mn35:26.2
  29. The idiom “presented with servings of food” (thālipākaā bhattābhihāraṁ) is elevated, occurring only in the context of aristocracy and sacrifice.

    ↩ mn35:29.1
  30. Puññamahī (“flourishing of merit”), for which there are several variants in text and commentary, is found only here and at AN 7.53:6.10, where it also concerns the dedication of merit to another. It might refer to the glorious results of merit, for which compare Chāndogya Upaniṣad 8.2, “endowed with that (divine fruit for which he wished) he flourishes (tena sampanno mahīyate). Or else it might invoke the idea that merit flourishes depending on the recipient (MN 142), like a seed on the earth (mahī; cp. puññakkhetta), which fits nicely with the Buddha’s response here.

    Bhikkhu Bodhi’s remark that Saccaka “must have still considered himself a saint” is unwarranted, as the same phrase at AN 7.53 is used by a devoted lay follower. Clearly he was arrogant, but it was others who called him sādhu.

    ↩ mn35:30.5
  31. According to one of the Chinese parallels, this statement was made by the Buddha in answer to a question by the mendicants after returning to the monastery (SA 110 at T ii 37b22).

    ↩ mn35:30.6